Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Testimony of Structure

Electronic data

Links

View graph of relations

The Testimony of Structure: Codecs and Contemporary Poetry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Testimony of Structure : Codecs and Contemporary Poetry. / Jones, Nathan.

In: APRJA, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{16766816d4af481e9bd859c53c6154f6,
title = "The Testimony of Structure: Codecs and Contemporary Poetry",
abstract = "Many contemporary theorists have observed the increasing directness of therelationship of language to economics through technology. Coming from theMarxist tradition of the Italian autonomist movement, both Franco Berardi{\textquoteright}s TheUprising: Poetry and Finance (from 2012), and Paolo Virno{\textquoteright}s The Grammatisation ofthe Multitude (from 2003) contend that the special circumstances of post-Fordistindustry – an industry based on cognitive and linguistic labour – places a greatdeal of focus on the cultural production of language. Thus, Virno describes cultureitself as the new “industry of the means of production” (Virno 61). Under the regime ofsemiocapitalism this suggests, language artefacts acquire ontological status on a par with more explicitly technological devices. This paper pursues Giorgio Agamben's notion 'testimony' in the context of this technologisation of language, in particular Agamben's (1999) affirmation that the testimony can be the site where the unspeakable is present as a 'darkness'. Using this notion, I asks how contemporary literature might withdraw its innovations from the role they play in “industry of the means of production” by a form intimate sharing that withdraws itself into error. It is in this paper that for the first time I propose the term {"}Glitch Poetic{"} to term a deployment of linguistic error that both signifies an intertwinement -- and endebtedness -- of language with the digital sphere, while constituting a refusal or resistance of the dissolution of literature into information flows. Using Ben Lerner's poetry book Mean Free Path as an example, I suggest the glitch poetic is a particular performance of the voice of a new kind of language, grounding and recontextualising itself in a shifting linguistic environment. *This paper was developed through talks given at conferences at Oxford, Cambridge and York Universities. It was delivered as a presentation at the new media festival Transmediale in 2016.",
author = "Nathan Jones",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
journal = "APRJA",
issn = "2245-7755",
publisher = "Digital aesthetics Research center, aarhus University in collaboration with transmediale, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Biennial",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Testimony of Structure

T2 - Codecs and Contemporary Poetry

AU - Jones, Nathan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Many contemporary theorists have observed the increasing directness of therelationship of language to economics through technology. Coming from theMarxist tradition of the Italian autonomist movement, both Franco Berardi’s TheUprising: Poetry and Finance (from 2012), and Paolo Virno’s The Grammatisation ofthe Multitude (from 2003) contend that the special circumstances of post-Fordistindustry – an industry based on cognitive and linguistic labour – places a greatdeal of focus on the cultural production of language. Thus, Virno describes cultureitself as the new “industry of the means of production” (Virno 61). Under the regime ofsemiocapitalism this suggests, language artefacts acquire ontological status on a par with more explicitly technological devices. This paper pursues Giorgio Agamben's notion 'testimony' in the context of this technologisation of language, in particular Agamben's (1999) affirmation that the testimony can be the site where the unspeakable is present as a 'darkness'. Using this notion, I asks how contemporary literature might withdraw its innovations from the role they play in “industry of the means of production” by a form intimate sharing that withdraws itself into error. It is in this paper that for the first time I propose the term "Glitch Poetic" to term a deployment of linguistic error that both signifies an intertwinement -- and endebtedness -- of language with the digital sphere, while constituting a refusal or resistance of the dissolution of literature into information flows. Using Ben Lerner's poetry book Mean Free Path as an example, I suggest the glitch poetic is a particular performance of the voice of a new kind of language, grounding and recontextualising itself in a shifting linguistic environment. *This paper was developed through talks given at conferences at Oxford, Cambridge and York Universities. It was delivered as a presentation at the new media festival Transmediale in 2016.

AB - Many contemporary theorists have observed the increasing directness of therelationship of language to economics through technology. Coming from theMarxist tradition of the Italian autonomist movement, both Franco Berardi’s TheUprising: Poetry and Finance (from 2012), and Paolo Virno’s The Grammatisation ofthe Multitude (from 2003) contend that the special circumstances of post-Fordistindustry – an industry based on cognitive and linguistic labour – places a greatdeal of focus on the cultural production of language. Thus, Virno describes cultureitself as the new “industry of the means of production” (Virno 61). Under the regime ofsemiocapitalism this suggests, language artefacts acquire ontological status on a par with more explicitly technological devices. This paper pursues Giorgio Agamben's notion 'testimony' in the context of this technologisation of language, in particular Agamben's (1999) affirmation that the testimony can be the site where the unspeakable is present as a 'darkness'. Using this notion, I asks how contemporary literature might withdraw its innovations from the role they play in “industry of the means of production” by a form intimate sharing that withdraws itself into error. It is in this paper that for the first time I propose the term "Glitch Poetic" to term a deployment of linguistic error that both signifies an intertwinement -- and endebtedness -- of language with the digital sphere, while constituting a refusal or resistance of the dissolution of literature into information flows. Using Ben Lerner's poetry book Mean Free Path as an example, I suggest the glitch poetic is a particular performance of the voice of a new kind of language, grounding and recontextualising itself in a shifting linguistic environment. *This paper was developed through talks given at conferences at Oxford, Cambridge and York Universities. It was delivered as a presentation at the new media festival Transmediale in 2016.

M3 - Journal article

JO - APRJA

JF - APRJA

SN - 2245-7755

M1 - 4

ER -