Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The threat of terror and the plausibility of po...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

The threat of terror and the plausibility of positivism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The threat of terror and the plausibility of positivism. / Campbell, David.

In: Public Law, Vol. 2009, No. 3, 07.2009, p. 501-518.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Campbell, D 2009, 'The threat of terror and the plausibility of positivism', Public Law, vol. 2009, no. 3, pp. 501-518.

APA

Vancouver

Author

Campbell, David. / The threat of terror and the plausibility of positivism. In: Public Law. 2009 ; Vol. 2009, No. 3. pp. 501-518.

Bibtex

@article{b0cd1e59eafd4d6aa3c2c5a9c4914ed2,
title = "The threat of terror and the plausibility of positivism",
abstract = "Discusses the finding of discrimination by the House of Lords in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department on whether the detention without trial of foreign nationals suspected of terrorist offences under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 breached the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 arts 5 and 14. Considers the implications of the decision in terms of the UK's adoption of European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence following the Human Rights Act 1998. Examines the application of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 s.4, the significance of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, and potential consequences for governments seeking to maintain public security.",
keywords = "Detention without trial, Discrimination, Legal positivism, Right to liberty and security, Terrorism",
author = "David Campbell",
year = "2009",
month = jul,
language = "English",
volume = "2009",
pages = "501--518",
journal = "Public Law",
issn = "0033-3565",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The threat of terror and the plausibility of positivism

AU - Campbell, David

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Discusses the finding of discrimination by the House of Lords in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department on whether the detention without trial of foreign nationals suspected of terrorist offences under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 breached the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 arts 5 and 14. Considers the implications of the decision in terms of the UK's adoption of European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence following the Human Rights Act 1998. Examines the application of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 s.4, the significance of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, and potential consequences for governments seeking to maintain public security.

AB - Discusses the finding of discrimination by the House of Lords in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department on whether the detention without trial of foreign nationals suspected of terrorist offences under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 breached the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 arts 5 and 14. Considers the implications of the decision in terms of the UK's adoption of European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence following the Human Rights Act 1998. Examines the application of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 s.4, the significance of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, and potential consequences for governments seeking to maintain public security.

KW - Detention without trial

KW - Discrimination

KW - Legal positivism

KW - Right to liberty and security

KW - Terrorism

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2009

SP - 501

EP - 518

JO - Public Law

JF - Public Law

SN - 0033-3565

IS - 3

ER -