Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The time course of preview search with colour d...
View graph of relations

The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli. / Humphreys, Glyn; Olivers, Christian N.L.; Braithwaite, Jason J.
In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 68, No. 8, 11.2006, p. 1351-1358.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Humphreys, G, Olivers, CNL & Braithwaite, JJ 2006, 'The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli', Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1351-1358.

APA

Humphreys, G., Olivers, C. N. L., & Braithwaite, J. J. (2006). The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 68(8), 1351-1358.

Vancouver

Humphreys G, Olivers CNL, Braithwaite JJ. The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics. 2006 Nov;68(8):1351-1358.

Author

Humphreys, Glyn ; Olivers, Christian N.L. ; Braithwaite, Jason J. / The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli. In: Perception and Psychophysics. 2006 ; Vol. 68, No. 8. pp. 1351-1358.

Bibtex

@article{2233b01020a242bb931a82bdc26cce35,
title = "The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli",
abstract = "We examined the time course of preview search, using stimuli that were defined by color, but not by luminance changes. We demonstrate that, under these conditions, search performance in a preview condition improved selectively over time, relative to a baseline condition in which all the items appeared together. The data confirm earlier reports from Humphreys, Kyllinsb{\ae}k, et al. (2004) and Watson and Humphreys (1997), who used luminance-defined stimuli and showed a long time course to preview search. The data contradict Donk and Verburg (2004), who argued that the preview benefit was instantaneous but did not include baseline conditions with which to test for any influence of distractors equivalent to the old items in preview search, even under nonpreview conditions. The data support the proposal that the prioritization of new items in preview search is a time-consuming business.",
author = "Glyn Humphreys and Olivers, {Christian N.L.} and Braithwaite, {Jason J}",
year = "2006",
month = nov,
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1351--1358",
journal = "Perception and Psychophysics",
issn = "0031-5117",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The time course of preview search with colour defined, not luminance defined stimuli

AU - Humphreys, Glyn

AU - Olivers, Christian N.L.

AU - Braithwaite, Jason J

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - We examined the time course of preview search, using stimuli that were defined by color, but not by luminance changes. We demonstrate that, under these conditions, search performance in a preview condition improved selectively over time, relative to a baseline condition in which all the items appeared together. The data confirm earlier reports from Humphreys, Kyllinsbæk, et al. (2004) and Watson and Humphreys (1997), who used luminance-defined stimuli and showed a long time course to preview search. The data contradict Donk and Verburg (2004), who argued that the preview benefit was instantaneous but did not include baseline conditions with which to test for any influence of distractors equivalent to the old items in preview search, even under nonpreview conditions. The data support the proposal that the prioritization of new items in preview search is a time-consuming business.

AB - We examined the time course of preview search, using stimuli that were defined by color, but not by luminance changes. We demonstrate that, under these conditions, search performance in a preview condition improved selectively over time, relative to a baseline condition in which all the items appeared together. The data confirm earlier reports from Humphreys, Kyllinsbæk, et al. (2004) and Watson and Humphreys (1997), who used luminance-defined stimuli and showed a long time course to preview search. The data contradict Donk and Verburg (2004), who argued that the preview benefit was instantaneous but did not include baseline conditions with which to test for any influence of distractors equivalent to the old items in preview search, even under nonpreview conditions. The data support the proposal that the prioritization of new items in preview search is a time-consuming business.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 68

SP - 1351

EP - 1358

JO - Perception and Psychophysics

JF - Perception and Psychophysics

SN - 0031-5117

IS - 8

ER -