The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command. / Hemming, L. P.

In: Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2010, p. 59-72.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Hemming, LP 2010, 'The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command', Studies in Christian Ethics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946809353004

APA

Hemming, L. P. (2010). The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command. Studies in Christian Ethics, 23(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946809353004

Vancouver

Hemming LP. The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command. Studies in Christian Ethics. 2010 Feb 1;23(1):59-72. doi: 10.1177/0953946809353004

Author

Hemming, L. P. / The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command. In: Studies in Christian Ethics. 2010 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 59-72.

Bibtex

@article{65190058ed2a4988bb9ce4b3114780da,

title = "The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command",

abstract = "This paper examines the way in which divine law and divine command have in cases been commandeered for the purposes of demonstrating fidelity to religious orthodoxy. It takes the example of one theologian{\textquoteright}s investigation into the tradition and asks whether, in the very name of producing an orthodox theology of sexual difference, the debate does not end up being cast in contemporary, sexualised terms. It then takes the example of how contemporary understandings of sexual difference can be read back into ancient texts by examining a reading of Parmenides, and by comparison with Aristotle{\textquoteright}s reading of sexual difference shows how that reading can be questioned. It concludes with an examination of a reading of a text of St. Augustine to show (1) how the traditions of celibacy and marriage have not been commensurate in the Christian tradition and (2) what goes wrong when they are asserted to be commensurate.",

keywords = "Augustine, celibacy , command , law , marriage , Parmenides , sexual difference",

author = "Hemming, {L. P.}",

year = "2010",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0953946809353004",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "59--72",

journal = "Studies in Christian Ethics",

issn = "0953-9468",

publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Undoing of Sex: The Proper Enjoyment of Divine Command

AU - Hemming, L. P.

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - This paper examines the way in which divine law and divine command have in cases been commandeered for the purposes of demonstrating fidelity to religious orthodoxy. It takes the example of one theologian’s investigation into the tradition and asks whether, in the very name of producing an orthodox theology of sexual difference, the debate does not end up being cast in contemporary, sexualised terms. It then takes the example of how contemporary understandings of sexual difference can be read back into ancient texts by examining a reading of Parmenides, and by comparison with Aristotle’s reading of sexual difference shows how that reading can be questioned. It concludes with an examination of a reading of a text of St. Augustine to show (1) how the traditions of celibacy and marriage have not been commensurate in the Christian tradition and (2) what goes wrong when they are asserted to be commensurate.

AB - This paper examines the way in which divine law and divine command have in cases been commandeered for the purposes of demonstrating fidelity to religious orthodoxy. It takes the example of one theologian’s investigation into the tradition and asks whether, in the very name of producing an orthodox theology of sexual difference, the debate does not end up being cast in contemporary, sexualised terms. It then takes the example of how contemporary understandings of sexual difference can be read back into ancient texts by examining a reading of Parmenides, and by comparison with Aristotle’s reading of sexual difference shows how that reading can be questioned. It concludes with an examination of a reading of a text of St. Augustine to show (1) how the traditions of celibacy and marriage have not been commensurate in the Christian tradition and (2) what goes wrong when they are asserted to be commensurate.

KW - Augustine

KW - celibacy

KW - command

KW - law

KW - marriage

KW - Parmenides

KW - sexual difference

U2 - 10.1177/0953946809353004

DO - 10.1177/0953946809353004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 59

EP - 72

JO - Studies in Christian Ethics

JF - Studies in Christian Ethics

SN - 0953-9468

IS - 1

ER -

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords