Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific information: A cross-country critique

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific information: A cross-country critique. / Alves, Paulo; Peasnell, Ken; Taylor, Paul.
In: Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Alves P, Peasnell K, Taylor P. The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific information: A cross-country critique. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 2010 Jan;37(1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02181.x

Author

Alves, Paulo ; Peasnell, Ken ; Taylor, Paul. / The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific information: A cross-country critique. In: Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 1-26.

Bibtex

@article{05a693dd27e341cfbde130bbe818ee17,
title = "The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific information: A cross-country critique",
abstract = "Recent research uses the degree of stock returns co-movement as a measure of the quality of a country's information environment. It has been argued that stronger property rights, better corporate governance regimes and more efficient enforcement mechanisms lead to prices incorporating more firm-specific information and, therefore, co-moving less with the market. In this paper, we use a much more comprehensive international data set than in prior research, encompassing forty countries over twenty years, to evaluate the reliability of this approach in a cross-country setting and to analyse the behaviour of the measure used. Our results demonstrate severe limitations in the use of co-movement as a measure of information quality. We highlight the instability of the measure and show that it can produce results that are often difficult to reconcile with such an informational explanation",
keywords = "information • R 2 • firm-specific information • market-wide information • volatility • disclosures • co-movement • cross-country information environment • synchronicity",
author = "Paulo Alves and Ken Peasnell and Paul Taylor",
note = "This is a pre-print of an article published in Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37 (1), 2010. (c) Wiley.",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02181.x",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Journal of Business Finance and Accounting",
issn = "1468-5957",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of the R2 as a measure of firm-specific information: A cross-country critique

AU - Alves, Paulo

AU - Peasnell, Ken

AU - Taylor, Paul

N1 - This is a pre-print of an article published in Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37 (1), 2010. (c) Wiley.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Recent research uses the degree of stock returns co-movement as a measure of the quality of a country's information environment. It has been argued that stronger property rights, better corporate governance regimes and more efficient enforcement mechanisms lead to prices incorporating more firm-specific information and, therefore, co-moving less with the market. In this paper, we use a much more comprehensive international data set than in prior research, encompassing forty countries over twenty years, to evaluate the reliability of this approach in a cross-country setting and to analyse the behaviour of the measure used. Our results demonstrate severe limitations in the use of co-movement as a measure of information quality. We highlight the instability of the measure and show that it can produce results that are often difficult to reconcile with such an informational explanation

AB - Recent research uses the degree of stock returns co-movement as a measure of the quality of a country's information environment. It has been argued that stronger property rights, better corporate governance regimes and more efficient enforcement mechanisms lead to prices incorporating more firm-specific information and, therefore, co-moving less with the market. In this paper, we use a much more comprehensive international data set than in prior research, encompassing forty countries over twenty years, to evaluate the reliability of this approach in a cross-country setting and to analyse the behaviour of the measure used. Our results demonstrate severe limitations in the use of co-movement as a measure of information quality. We highlight the instability of the measure and show that it can produce results that are often difficult to reconcile with such an informational explanation

KW - information • R 2 • firm-specific information • market-wide information • volatility • disclosures • co-movement • cross-country information environment • synchronicity

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02181.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02181.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

JF - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

SN - 1468-5957

IS - 1

ER -