Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Theoretical reflections on narrative in action ...

Electronic data

  • Nuria AR_Final version

    Accepted author manuscript, 142 KB, Word document

  • Toledano&Anderson 2020

    178 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Theoretical reflections on narrative in action research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Theoretical reflections on narrative in action research. / Toledano, Nuria; Anderson, Alistair R.
In: Action Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.09.2020, p. 302-318.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Toledano N, Anderson AR. Theoretical reflections on narrative in action research. Action Research. 2020 Sept 1;18(3):302-318. Epub 2020 Sept 1. doi: 10.1177/1476750317748439

Author

Toledano, Nuria ; Anderson, Alistair R. / Theoretical reflections on narrative in action research. In: Action Research. 2020 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 302-318.

Bibtex

@article{4c07e7826d344a118a7cccbd8643c666,
title = "Theoretical reflections on narrative in action research",
abstract = "Narrative is an important tool for developing and writing up action research experiences. Its power lies in the fact that narrative construction and narrative recounting are fundamental human communication practices. Narratives are also knowledge producing devices, since they make sense of personal experiences and share that sense-giving with others. However, the twinned duality of narrative knowing (sense-making) and narrative telling (communicating that sense) has often caused narrative as a methodological approach to be disregarded or misunderstood. Our objective is to reflect on how we can best use the narrative method in action research by paying due attention to these issues. In doing so, we consider ontologies, epistemologies and key characteristics. We argue that what has been seen as a weakness in the narrative method, its deep subjectivity, can actually be employed as an analytical strength in action research. We show how examining explanations of context, inherent in narrative processes, can provide rich insights into the meanings of phenomena.",
keywords = "Action research, narrative knowing, narrative method, narrative telling, qualitative research",
author = "Nuria Toledano and Anderson, {Alistair R.}",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476750317748439",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "302--318",
journal = "Action Research",
issn = "1476-7503",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theoretical reflections on narrative in action research

AU - Toledano, Nuria

AU - Anderson, Alistair R.

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - Narrative is an important tool for developing and writing up action research experiences. Its power lies in the fact that narrative construction and narrative recounting are fundamental human communication practices. Narratives are also knowledge producing devices, since they make sense of personal experiences and share that sense-giving with others. However, the twinned duality of narrative knowing (sense-making) and narrative telling (communicating that sense) has often caused narrative as a methodological approach to be disregarded or misunderstood. Our objective is to reflect on how we can best use the narrative method in action research by paying due attention to these issues. In doing so, we consider ontologies, epistemologies and key characteristics. We argue that what has been seen as a weakness in the narrative method, its deep subjectivity, can actually be employed as an analytical strength in action research. We show how examining explanations of context, inherent in narrative processes, can provide rich insights into the meanings of phenomena.

AB - Narrative is an important tool for developing and writing up action research experiences. Its power lies in the fact that narrative construction and narrative recounting are fundamental human communication practices. Narratives are also knowledge producing devices, since they make sense of personal experiences and share that sense-giving with others. However, the twinned duality of narrative knowing (sense-making) and narrative telling (communicating that sense) has often caused narrative as a methodological approach to be disregarded or misunderstood. Our objective is to reflect on how we can best use the narrative method in action research by paying due attention to these issues. In doing so, we consider ontologies, epistemologies and key characteristics. We argue that what has been seen as a weakness in the narrative method, its deep subjectivity, can actually be employed as an analytical strength in action research. We show how examining explanations of context, inherent in narrative processes, can provide rich insights into the meanings of phenomena.

KW - Action research

KW - narrative knowing

KW - narrative method

KW - narrative telling

KW - qualitative research

U2 - 10.1177/1476750317748439

DO - 10.1177/1476750317748439

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85085894042

VL - 18

SP - 302

EP - 318

JO - Action Research

JF - Action Research

SN - 1476-7503

IS - 3

ER -