Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Theory of Self‐Determination
T2 - A Viable Solution for the Kashmir Conflict
AU - Haider, Muhammad Waqas
PY - 2025/5/6
Y1 - 2025/5/6
N2 - This study critically examines the longstanding rivalry between two South Asian nuclear powers, Pakistan and India, with a focus on the Kashmir conflict. It proposes a viable resolution grounded in the theoretical framework of self‐determination. The analysis explores the case for self‐determination in Kashmir by investigating key factors, including persistent oppression and injustice, widespread popular uprisings supported by the local population, and the repeated failure of conflict resolution and reconciliation strategies to achieve an amicable solution. It also evaluates potential pathways for resolving the Kashmir conflict, emphasizing both bilateral approaches and multilateral or United Nations‐mediated frameworks. The findings indicate that the principle of self‐determination provides a robust foundation for resolving this protracted social conflict. However, the prospects for a bilateral resolution appear limited, as the status quo largely benefits India, the dominant actor in the dispute. While multilateral approaches offer greater potential for implementation, they face significant challenges. The study concludes by emphasizing the necessity for Pakistan and India to adopt a comprehensive and integrated strategy that prioritizes self‐determination as a means to foster mutual trust and ensure peaceful coexistence in the region.
AB - This study critically examines the longstanding rivalry between two South Asian nuclear powers, Pakistan and India, with a focus on the Kashmir conflict. It proposes a viable resolution grounded in the theoretical framework of self‐determination. The analysis explores the case for self‐determination in Kashmir by investigating key factors, including persistent oppression and injustice, widespread popular uprisings supported by the local population, and the repeated failure of conflict resolution and reconciliation strategies to achieve an amicable solution. It also evaluates potential pathways for resolving the Kashmir conflict, emphasizing both bilateral approaches and multilateral or United Nations‐mediated frameworks. The findings indicate that the principle of self‐determination provides a robust foundation for resolving this protracted social conflict. However, the prospects for a bilateral resolution appear limited, as the status quo largely benefits India, the dominant actor in the dispute. While multilateral approaches offer greater potential for implementation, they face significant challenges. The study concludes by emphasizing the necessity for Pakistan and India to adopt a comprehensive and integrated strategy that prioritizes self‐determination as a means to foster mutual trust and ensure peaceful coexistence in the region.
KW - 克什米尔冲突
KW - 自决
KW - South Asia
KW - 印度
KW - Pakistán
KW - self‐determination
KW - United Nations
KW - conflict resolution
KW - India
KW - 南亚
KW - 冲突解决
KW - Resolución de Conflictos
KW - 巴基斯坦
KW - Autodeterminación
KW - Asia Meridional
KW - Kasmir conflict
KW - 联合国
KW - Conflicto de Cachemira
KW - Pakistan
KW - Naciones Unidas
U2 - 10.1002/waf2.12071
DO - 10.1002/waf2.12071
M3 - Journal article
VL - 188
JO - World Affairs
JF - World Affairs
SN - 0043-8200
IS - 2
M1 - e12071
ER -