Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > There’s no such thing as a free lunch
View graph of relations

There’s no such thing as a free lunch: evidence of altruism and agency from household expenditure responses to child nutrition programs

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Published

Standard

There’s no such thing as a free lunch: evidence of altruism and agency from household expenditure responses to child nutrition programs. / Bingley, Paul; Walker, Ian.
In: Review of Economics of the Household, Vol. 11, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 371-392.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bingley P, Walker I. There’s no such thing as a free lunch: evidence of altruism and agency from household expenditure responses to child nutrition programs. Review of Economics of the Household. 2013 Sept;11(3):371-392. Epub 2013 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9196-7

Author

Bibtex

@article{93251072ee884a68ab00be8fe3e372dd,
title = "There{\textquoteright}s no such thing as a free lunch: evidence of altruism and agency from household expenditure responses to child nutrition programs",
abstract = "Many countries provide transfers for particular client groups such as children and often such transfers are in-kind rather than cash. However, this may, at least partially, crowd out private expenditures on the goods in question because they reduce the incentive for other individuals, like parents, to make altruistic transfers. They are often made to one household member on behalf of another so there may also be agency concerns: the recipient may divert some of the transfer away from the intended beneficiary. This paper throws light on these issues using three nutrition programs for children in UK households: free lunch at school for children from poor households; free milk to poor households with pre-school children; and free milk at day-care for pre-school children in attendance regardless of parental income. We provide difference in difference estimates based on a welfare reform and on variation in the timing of school holidays. These estimates are broadly consistent with estimates of a structural model that is identified using the same welfare reform. This gives us confidence in the interpretation of our estimates that the structural model provides but the simple difference-in-difference cannot.",
keywords = "In-kind transfers, program participation, altruism, agency",
author = "Paul Bingley and Ian Walker",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1007/s11150-013-9196-7",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "371--392",
journal = "Review of Economics of the Household",
issn = "1569-5239",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - There’s no such thing as a free lunch

T2 - evidence of altruism and agency from household expenditure responses to child nutrition programs

AU - Bingley, Paul

AU - Walker, Ian

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Many countries provide transfers for particular client groups such as children and often such transfers are in-kind rather than cash. However, this may, at least partially, crowd out private expenditures on the goods in question because they reduce the incentive for other individuals, like parents, to make altruistic transfers. They are often made to one household member on behalf of another so there may also be agency concerns: the recipient may divert some of the transfer away from the intended beneficiary. This paper throws light on these issues using three nutrition programs for children in UK households: free lunch at school for children from poor households; free milk to poor households with pre-school children; and free milk at day-care for pre-school children in attendance regardless of parental income. We provide difference in difference estimates based on a welfare reform and on variation in the timing of school holidays. These estimates are broadly consistent with estimates of a structural model that is identified using the same welfare reform. This gives us confidence in the interpretation of our estimates that the structural model provides but the simple difference-in-difference cannot.

AB - Many countries provide transfers for particular client groups such as children and often such transfers are in-kind rather than cash. However, this may, at least partially, crowd out private expenditures on the goods in question because they reduce the incentive for other individuals, like parents, to make altruistic transfers. They are often made to one household member on behalf of another so there may also be agency concerns: the recipient may divert some of the transfer away from the intended beneficiary. This paper throws light on these issues using three nutrition programs for children in UK households: free lunch at school for children from poor households; free milk to poor households with pre-school children; and free milk at day-care for pre-school children in attendance regardless of parental income. We provide difference in difference estimates based on a welfare reform and on variation in the timing of school holidays. These estimates are broadly consistent with estimates of a structural model that is identified using the same welfare reform. This gives us confidence in the interpretation of our estimates that the structural model provides but the simple difference-in-difference cannot.

KW - In-kind transfers

KW - program participation

KW - altruism

KW - agency

U2 - 10.1007/s11150-013-9196-7

DO - 10.1007/s11150-013-9196-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 371

EP - 392

JO - Review of Economics of the Household

JF - Review of Economics of the Household

SN - 1569-5239

IS - 3

ER -