Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘They Are All the Same’

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘They Are All the Same’: Securitising the Muslim Brotherhood in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Ordering Space and the Regional ‘Common Sense’

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

‘They Are All the Same’: Securitising the Muslim Brotherhood in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Ordering Space and the Regional ‘Common Sense’. / Bordon Osorio, Javier .
In: The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 12.05.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bordon Osorio J. ‘They Are All the Same’: Securitising the Muslim Brotherhood in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Ordering Space and the Regional ‘Common Sense’. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs. 2025 May 12. Epub 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2025.2491359

Author

Bibtex

@article{8ae60e773e3d4e89a43c9a83a1d54bd3,
title = "{\textquoteleft}They Are All the Same{\textquoteright}: Securitising the Muslim Brotherhood in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Ordering Space and the Regional {\textquoteleft}Common Sense{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "Order in the Middle East cannot be fully understood without delving into the securitisation of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). In its multi-faceted existence as an organisation, a movement and, most importantly, an idea, the MB weaves together transnational and domestic struggles over what political projects are legitimate, who holds dominant positions and other divisions and gradations that organise social space. By looking at securitisation as a struggle over order, it is possible to examine the post-2011 securitisation of the MB and its spatial implications, focusing on processes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and Egypt at the intersection of transnational politics. Combining securitisation theory, Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s social theory and spatial theory strengthens our understanding of how interlocking securitisation processes carry far-reaching implications for power, order and space in the Middle East, shaping relations and the normative {\textquoteleft}common sense{\textquoteright} in and across scales.",
author = "{Bordon Osorio}, Javier",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/03932729.2025.2491359",
language = "English",
journal = "The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs",
issn = "0393-2729",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘They Are All the Same’

T2 - Securitising the Muslim Brotherhood in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Ordering Space and the Regional ‘Common Sense’

AU - Bordon Osorio, Javier

PY - 2025/5/12

Y1 - 2025/5/12

N2 - Order in the Middle East cannot be fully understood without delving into the securitisation of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). In its multi-faceted existence as an organisation, a movement and, most importantly, an idea, the MB weaves together transnational and domestic struggles over what political projects are legitimate, who holds dominant positions and other divisions and gradations that organise social space. By looking at securitisation as a struggle over order, it is possible to examine the post-2011 securitisation of the MB and its spatial implications, focusing on processes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and Egypt at the intersection of transnational politics. Combining securitisation theory, Bourdieu’s social theory and spatial theory strengthens our understanding of how interlocking securitisation processes carry far-reaching implications for power, order and space in the Middle East, shaping relations and the normative ‘common sense’ in and across scales.

AB - Order in the Middle East cannot be fully understood without delving into the securitisation of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). In its multi-faceted existence as an organisation, a movement and, most importantly, an idea, the MB weaves together transnational and domestic struggles over what political projects are legitimate, who holds dominant positions and other divisions and gradations that organise social space. By looking at securitisation as a struggle over order, it is possible to examine the post-2011 securitisation of the MB and its spatial implications, focusing on processes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and Egypt at the intersection of transnational politics. Combining securitisation theory, Bourdieu’s social theory and spatial theory strengthens our understanding of how interlocking securitisation processes carry far-reaching implications for power, order and space in the Middle East, shaping relations and the normative ‘common sense’ in and across scales.

U2 - 10.1080/03932729.2025.2491359

DO - 10.1080/03932729.2025.2491359

M3 - Journal article

JO - The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs

JF - The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs

SN - 0393-2729

ER -