Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Threat-based regulation and endogenously determ...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments. / Elliott, C F; Acutt, M Z.
Lancaster University: The Department of Economics, 2001. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Elliott, CF & Acutt, MZ 2001 'Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments' Economics Working Paper Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster University.

APA

Elliott, C. F., & Acutt, M. Z. (2001). Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments. (Economics Working Paper Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Elliott CF, Acutt MZ. Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments. Lancaster University: The Department of Economics. 2001. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Author

Elliott, C F ; Acutt, M Z. / Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments. Lancaster University : The Department of Economics, 2001. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{c285f751d5cb4efd8ec8f2f9ed0b08ca,
title = "Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments",
abstract = "We present a theoretical model to show that through the adoption of simple regulatory rules, the threat of regulation as well as regulation itself impacts upon a firm s pricing strategy. The model is relevant to general antitrust policy, as well as the regulation of individual utility industries. While the paper focuses on the threat of revenue regulation, the principal results may also hold when regulation takes the form of penalties on prices charged. In the model the probability of regulatory intervention increases with the level of price charged, as does the toughness of any regulation imposed. This form of regulation, although not optimal, has the advantage of being relatively simple to apply. The proposed regulatory rules offer a form of transparent regulation that could circumvent fears of regulatory capture.",
keywords = "Regulation, Revenue, Antitrust, Threat",
author = "Elliott, {C F} and Acutt, {M Z}",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments

AU - Elliott, C F

AU - Acutt, M Z

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We present a theoretical model to show that through the adoption of simple regulatory rules, the threat of regulation as well as regulation itself impacts upon a firm s pricing strategy. The model is relevant to general antitrust policy, as well as the regulation of individual utility industries. While the paper focuses on the threat of revenue regulation, the principal results may also hold when regulation takes the form of penalties on prices charged. In the model the probability of regulatory intervention increases with the level of price charged, as does the toughness of any regulation imposed. This form of regulation, although not optimal, has the advantage of being relatively simple to apply. The proposed regulatory rules offer a form of transparent regulation that could circumvent fears of regulatory capture.

AB - We present a theoretical model to show that through the adoption of simple regulatory rules, the threat of regulation as well as regulation itself impacts upon a firm s pricing strategy. The model is relevant to general antitrust policy, as well as the regulation of individual utility industries. While the paper focuses on the threat of revenue regulation, the principal results may also hold when regulation takes the form of penalties on prices charged. In the model the probability of regulatory intervention increases with the level of price charged, as does the toughness of any regulation imposed. This form of regulation, although not optimal, has the advantage of being relatively simple to apply. The proposed regulatory rules offer a form of transparent regulation that could circumvent fears of regulatory capture.

KW - Regulation

KW - Revenue

KW - Antitrust

KW - Threat

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Threat-based regulation and endogenously determined punishments

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster University

ER -