Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Time, Self and Reified Artefacts

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Time, Self and Reified Artefacts

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Time, Self and Reified Artefacts. / Knights, David; Yakhlef, Ali.
In: Time & Society, Vol. 14, No. 3, 30.09.2005, p. 283-302.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Knights, D & Yakhlef, A 2005, 'Time, Self and Reified Artefacts', Time & Society, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05055139

APA

Knights, D., & Yakhlef, A. (2005). Time, Self and Reified Artefacts. Time & Society, 14(3), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05055139

Vancouver

Knights D, Yakhlef A. Time, Self and Reified Artefacts. Time & Society. 2005 Sept 30;14(3):283-302. doi: 10.1177/0961463X05055139

Author

Knights, David ; Yakhlef, Ali. / Time, Self and Reified Artefacts. In: Time & Society. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 283-302.

Bibtex

@article{1f96666fb7874bc5af7bca8fd5d5989b,
title = "Time, Self and Reified Artefacts",
abstract = "Discursive accounts of time tend to focus on a deconstruction of taken-for-granted notions of clock time, restricted to linear measurable units. By contrast the present article examines some of the discourses and practices deployed by managers in their attempts to control time; in the final instance, it shows how time can be a mystery that escapes such managerial pursuits and preoccupations. More specifically, we draw on Levinas's ideas on time and the {\textquoteleft}Other{\textquoteright}, and use two managerial discourses to illustrate how reification (through the use of technological and institutional artefacts) as attempts to control time tend to result in a proliferation of participation but, equally, an insistence on participation may invoke an intensification of control through reification. Reified relationships invariably result in a perpetual return to the Other, or what we have called participation. However, to varying degrees, our participatory mode is not possible without reification. Yet {\textquoteleft}relationships{\textquoteright} cannot be completely delegated to rationally calculating devices, formal institutions, or markets. Cooperation has its source not in reified forms of rationality (nor of irrationality), but in the human encounter with the Other. The organizational, social order is based on personal relations and personal responsibilities.",
keywords = "credit scoring, outsourcing contract, participation, personal relations, reification, time and the {\textquoteleft}Other{\textquoteright}",
author = "David Knights and Ali Yakhlef",
year = "2005",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/0961463X05055139",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "283--302",
journal = "Time & Society",
issn = "0961-463X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time, Self and Reified Artefacts

AU - Knights, David

AU - Yakhlef, Ali

PY - 2005/9/30

Y1 - 2005/9/30

N2 - Discursive accounts of time tend to focus on a deconstruction of taken-for-granted notions of clock time, restricted to linear measurable units. By contrast the present article examines some of the discourses and practices deployed by managers in their attempts to control time; in the final instance, it shows how time can be a mystery that escapes such managerial pursuits and preoccupations. More specifically, we draw on Levinas's ideas on time and the ‘Other’, and use two managerial discourses to illustrate how reification (through the use of technological and institutional artefacts) as attempts to control time tend to result in a proliferation of participation but, equally, an insistence on participation may invoke an intensification of control through reification. Reified relationships invariably result in a perpetual return to the Other, or what we have called participation. However, to varying degrees, our participatory mode is not possible without reification. Yet ‘relationships’ cannot be completely delegated to rationally calculating devices, formal institutions, or markets. Cooperation has its source not in reified forms of rationality (nor of irrationality), but in the human encounter with the Other. The organizational, social order is based on personal relations and personal responsibilities.

AB - Discursive accounts of time tend to focus on a deconstruction of taken-for-granted notions of clock time, restricted to linear measurable units. By contrast the present article examines some of the discourses and practices deployed by managers in their attempts to control time; in the final instance, it shows how time can be a mystery that escapes such managerial pursuits and preoccupations. More specifically, we draw on Levinas's ideas on time and the ‘Other’, and use two managerial discourses to illustrate how reification (through the use of technological and institutional artefacts) as attempts to control time tend to result in a proliferation of participation but, equally, an insistence on participation may invoke an intensification of control through reification. Reified relationships invariably result in a perpetual return to the Other, or what we have called participation. However, to varying degrees, our participatory mode is not possible without reification. Yet ‘relationships’ cannot be completely delegated to rationally calculating devices, formal institutions, or markets. Cooperation has its source not in reified forms of rationality (nor of irrationality), but in the human encounter with the Other. The organizational, social order is based on personal relations and personal responsibilities.

KW - credit scoring

KW - outsourcing contract

KW - participation

KW - personal relations

KW - reification

KW - time and the ‘Other’

U2 - 10.1177/0961463X05055139

DO - 10.1177/0961463X05055139

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:27644521863

VL - 14

SP - 283

EP - 302

JO - Time & Society

JF - Time & Society

SN - 0961-463X

IS - 3

ER -