Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Time to integrate global climate change and bio...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas. / Pettorelli, N.; Graham, N.A.J.; Seddon, N. et al.
In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 58, No. 11, 30.11.2021, p. 2384-2393.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Pettorelli, N, Graham, NAJ, Seddon, N, Maria da Cunha Bustamante, M, Lowton, MJ, Sutherland, WJ, Koldewey, HJ, Prentice, HC & Barlow, J 2021, 'Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 2384-2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13985

APA

Pettorelli, N., Graham, N. A. J., Seddon, N., Maria da Cunha Bustamante, M., Lowton, M. J., Sutherland, W. J., Koldewey, H. J., Prentice, H. C., & Barlow, J. (2021). Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(11), 2384-2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13985

Vancouver

Pettorelli N, Graham NAJ, Seddon N, Maria da Cunha Bustamante M, Lowton MJ, Sutherland WJ et al. Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2021 Nov 30;58(11):2384-2393. Epub 2021 Sept 21. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13985

Author

Pettorelli, N. ; Graham, N.A.J. ; Seddon, N. et al. / Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2021 ; Vol. 58, No. 11. pp. 2384-2393.

Bibtex

@article{80705d84f6d14ea8b9ca17573ed80811,
title = "Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas",
abstract = "There is an increasing recognition that, although the climate change and biodiversity crises are fundamentally connected, they have been primarily addressed independently and a more integrated global approach is essential to tackle these two global challenges. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are hailed as a pathway for promoting synergies between the climate change and biodiversity agendas. There are, however, uncertainties and difficulties associated with the implementation of NbS, while the evidence regarding their benefits for biodiversity remains limited. We identify five key research areas where incomplete or poor information hinders the development of integrated biodiversity and climate solutions. These relate to refining our understanding of how climate change mitigation and adaptation approaches benefit biodiversity conservation; enhancing our ability to track and predict ecosystems on the move and/or facing collapse; improving our capacity to predict the impacts of climate change on the effectiveness of NbS; developing solutions that match the temporal, spatial and functional scale of the challenges; and developing a comprehensive and practical framework for assessing, and mitigating against, the risks posed by the implementation of NbS. Policy implications. The Conference of the Parties (COP) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP26) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP15) present a clear policy window for developing coherent policy frameworks that align targets across the nexus of biodiversity and climate change. This window should (a) address the substantial and chronic underfunding of global biodiversity conservation, (b) remove financial incentives that negatively impact biodiversity and/or climate change, (c) develop higher levels of integration between the biodiversity and climate change agendas, (d) agree on a monitoring framework that enables the standardised quantification and comparison of biodiversity gains associated with NbS across ecosystems and over time and (e) rethink environmental legislation to better support biodiversity conservation in times of rapid climatic change. ",
keywords = "ecosystem collapse, environmental legislation, Nature-based Solutions, protected areas, restoration, rewilding, wildlife management",
author = "N. Pettorelli and N.A.J. Graham and N. Seddon and {Maria da Cunha Bustamante}, M. and M.J. Lowton and W.J. Sutherland and H.J. Koldewey and H.C. Prentice and J. Barlow",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13985",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "2384--2393",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas

AU - Pettorelli, N.

AU - Graham, N.A.J.

AU - Seddon, N.

AU - Maria da Cunha Bustamante, M.

AU - Lowton, M.J.

AU - Sutherland, W.J.

AU - Koldewey, H.J.

AU - Prentice, H.C.

AU - Barlow, J.

PY - 2021/11/30

Y1 - 2021/11/30

N2 - There is an increasing recognition that, although the climate change and biodiversity crises are fundamentally connected, they have been primarily addressed independently and a more integrated global approach is essential to tackle these two global challenges. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are hailed as a pathway for promoting synergies between the climate change and biodiversity agendas. There are, however, uncertainties and difficulties associated with the implementation of NbS, while the evidence regarding their benefits for biodiversity remains limited. We identify five key research areas where incomplete or poor information hinders the development of integrated biodiversity and climate solutions. These relate to refining our understanding of how climate change mitigation and adaptation approaches benefit biodiversity conservation; enhancing our ability to track and predict ecosystems on the move and/or facing collapse; improving our capacity to predict the impacts of climate change on the effectiveness of NbS; developing solutions that match the temporal, spatial and functional scale of the challenges; and developing a comprehensive and practical framework for assessing, and mitigating against, the risks posed by the implementation of NbS. Policy implications. The Conference of the Parties (COP) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP26) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP15) present a clear policy window for developing coherent policy frameworks that align targets across the nexus of biodiversity and climate change. This window should (a) address the substantial and chronic underfunding of global biodiversity conservation, (b) remove financial incentives that negatively impact biodiversity and/or climate change, (c) develop higher levels of integration between the biodiversity and climate change agendas, (d) agree on a monitoring framework that enables the standardised quantification and comparison of biodiversity gains associated with NbS across ecosystems and over time and (e) rethink environmental legislation to better support biodiversity conservation in times of rapid climatic change.

AB - There is an increasing recognition that, although the climate change and biodiversity crises are fundamentally connected, they have been primarily addressed independently and a more integrated global approach is essential to tackle these two global challenges. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are hailed as a pathway for promoting synergies between the climate change and biodiversity agendas. There are, however, uncertainties and difficulties associated with the implementation of NbS, while the evidence regarding their benefits for biodiversity remains limited. We identify five key research areas where incomplete or poor information hinders the development of integrated biodiversity and climate solutions. These relate to refining our understanding of how climate change mitigation and adaptation approaches benefit biodiversity conservation; enhancing our ability to track and predict ecosystems on the move and/or facing collapse; improving our capacity to predict the impacts of climate change on the effectiveness of NbS; developing solutions that match the temporal, spatial and functional scale of the challenges; and developing a comprehensive and practical framework for assessing, and mitigating against, the risks posed by the implementation of NbS. Policy implications. The Conference of the Parties (COP) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP26) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP15) present a clear policy window for developing coherent policy frameworks that align targets across the nexus of biodiversity and climate change. This window should (a) address the substantial and chronic underfunding of global biodiversity conservation, (b) remove financial incentives that negatively impact biodiversity and/or climate change, (c) develop higher levels of integration between the biodiversity and climate change agendas, (d) agree on a monitoring framework that enables the standardised quantification and comparison of biodiversity gains associated with NbS across ecosystems and over time and (e) rethink environmental legislation to better support biodiversity conservation in times of rapid climatic change.

KW - ecosystem collapse

KW - environmental legislation

KW - Nature-based Solutions

KW - protected areas

KW - restoration

KW - rewilding

KW - wildlife management

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13985

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13985

M3 - Journal article

VL - 58

SP - 2384

EP - 2393

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 11

ER -