Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in ...
View graph of relations

Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes. / Whiteside, James R.; Allinson, Sarah L.; McMillan, Trevor J.
In: Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol. 87, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 435-440.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Whiteside, JR, Allinson, SL & McMillan, TJ 2011, 'Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes.', Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.x

APA

Whiteside, J. R., Allinson, S. L., & McMillan, T. J. (2011). Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 87(2), 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.x

Vancouver

Whiteside JR, Allinson SL, McMillan TJ. Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2011 Mar;87(2):435-440. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.x

Author

Whiteside, James R. ; Allinson, Sarah L. ; McMillan, Trevor J. / Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes. In: Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2011 ; Vol. 87, No. 2. pp. 435-440.

Bibtex

@article{c2d2892c159348448d12240d4078f52e,
title = "Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes.",
abstract = "The bystander effect is defined as the induction of cellular damage in unirradiated cells, induced by irradiated cells in the surrounding area. Our laboratory has previously identified that an environmentally relevant dose of UVA is able to induce the effect in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, seen as reduced clonogenic survival. Here we report on our investigations into the periods over which the bystander signals are released by the irradiated cells and for how long unirradiated cells need to be exposed to them for the effect to be induced. Using a coincubation system we have identified that irradiated cells do not release the signals immediately following irradiation but have a time lag of over 24 h before levels are sufficient to induce the effect, with the signals being released for a minimum of 3 days following irradiation. We have also found that the recipient cells only require at most 24 h of exposure to these signals for induction of the effect. These data indicate that a single exposure to UVA can exert an effect for several days postirradiation, thus amplifying the deleterious effects of exposure.",
author = "Whiteside, {James R.} and Allinson, {Sarah L.} and McMillan, {Trevor J.}",
year = "2011",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.x",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "435--440",
journal = "Photochemistry and Photobiology",
issn = "0031-8655",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timeframes of UVA-induced bystander effects in human keratinocytes.

AU - Whiteside, James R.

AU - Allinson, Sarah L.

AU - McMillan, Trevor J.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The bystander effect is defined as the induction of cellular damage in unirradiated cells, induced by irradiated cells in the surrounding area. Our laboratory has previously identified that an environmentally relevant dose of UVA is able to induce the effect in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, seen as reduced clonogenic survival. Here we report on our investigations into the periods over which the bystander signals are released by the irradiated cells and for how long unirradiated cells need to be exposed to them for the effect to be induced. Using a coincubation system we have identified that irradiated cells do not release the signals immediately following irradiation but have a time lag of over 24 h before levels are sufficient to induce the effect, with the signals being released for a minimum of 3 days following irradiation. We have also found that the recipient cells only require at most 24 h of exposure to these signals for induction of the effect. These data indicate that a single exposure to UVA can exert an effect for several days postirradiation, thus amplifying the deleterious effects of exposure.

AB - The bystander effect is defined as the induction of cellular damage in unirradiated cells, induced by irradiated cells in the surrounding area. Our laboratory has previously identified that an environmentally relevant dose of UVA is able to induce the effect in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, seen as reduced clonogenic survival. Here we report on our investigations into the periods over which the bystander signals are released by the irradiated cells and for how long unirradiated cells need to be exposed to them for the effect to be induced. Using a coincubation system we have identified that irradiated cells do not release the signals immediately following irradiation but have a time lag of over 24 h before levels are sufficient to induce the effect, with the signals being released for a minimum of 3 days following irradiation. We have also found that the recipient cells only require at most 24 h of exposure to these signals for induction of the effect. These data indicate that a single exposure to UVA can exert an effect for several days postirradiation, thus amplifying the deleterious effects of exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952192019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00881.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 87

SP - 435

EP - 440

JO - Photochemistry and Photobiology

JF - Photochemistry and Photobiology

SN - 0031-8655

IS - 2

ER -