Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for s...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP ATTENTIONAL BIASES FOR SMOKING-RELATED STIMULI (Accepted Feb 22 2001)

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Addictive Bahviors. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Addictive Behaviors, 118, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886

    Accepted author manuscript, 250 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers. / Wilcockson, Thomas; Pothos, Emmanuel; Osborne, Ashley et al.
In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 118, 106886, 31.07.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wilcockson T, Pothos E, Osborne A, Crawford T. Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers. Addictive Behaviors. 2021 Jul 31;118:106886. Epub 2021 Mar 4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886

Author

Wilcockson, Thomas ; Pothos, Emmanuel ; Osborne, Ashley et al. / Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli : Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2021 ; Vol. 118.

Bibtex

@article{94a55e40519845939324fa9088ced158,
title = "Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers",
abstract = "Introduction: Substance use causes attentional biases for substance-related stimuli. Both bottom-up (preferential processing) and top-down (inhibitory control) processes are involved in attentional biases. We explored these aspects of attentional bias by using dependent and non-dependent cigarette smokers in order to see whether these two groups would differ in terms of general inhibitory control, bottom-up attentional bias, and top-down attentional biases. This enables us to see whether consumption behaviour would affect these cognitive responses to smoking-related stimuli. Methods: Smokers were categorised as either dependent (N=26) or non-dependent (N=34) smokers. A further group of non-smokers (N=32) were recruited to act as controls. Participants then completed a behavioural inhibition task with general stimuli, a smoking-related eye tracking version of the dot-probe task, and an eye-tracking inhibition task with smoking-related stimuli. Results: Results indicated that dependent smokers had decreased inhibition and increased attentional bias for smoking-related stimuli (and not control stimuli). By contrast, a decreased inhibition for smoking-related stimuli (in comparison to control stimuli) was not observed for non-dependent smokers. Conclusions: Preferential processing of substance-related stimuli may indicate usage of a substance, whereas poor inhibitory control for substance-related stimuli may only emerge if dependence develops. The results suggest that how people engage with substance abuse is important for top-down attentional biases. ",
keywords = "attentional bias, incentive salience, automaticity, smoking, inhibition, inhibitory control, dot-probe task",
author = "Thomas Wilcockson and Emmanuel Pothos and Ashley Osborne and Trevor Crawford",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Addictive Bahviors. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Addictive Behaviors, 118, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli

T2 - Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers

AU - Wilcockson, Thomas

AU - Pothos, Emmanuel

AU - Osborne, Ashley

AU - Crawford, Trevor

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Addictive Bahviors. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Addictive Behaviors, 118, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886

PY - 2021/7/31

Y1 - 2021/7/31

N2 - Introduction: Substance use causes attentional biases for substance-related stimuli. Both bottom-up (preferential processing) and top-down (inhibitory control) processes are involved in attentional biases. We explored these aspects of attentional bias by using dependent and non-dependent cigarette smokers in order to see whether these two groups would differ in terms of general inhibitory control, bottom-up attentional bias, and top-down attentional biases. This enables us to see whether consumption behaviour would affect these cognitive responses to smoking-related stimuli. Methods: Smokers were categorised as either dependent (N=26) or non-dependent (N=34) smokers. A further group of non-smokers (N=32) were recruited to act as controls. Participants then completed a behavioural inhibition task with general stimuli, a smoking-related eye tracking version of the dot-probe task, and an eye-tracking inhibition task with smoking-related stimuli. Results: Results indicated that dependent smokers had decreased inhibition and increased attentional bias for smoking-related stimuli (and not control stimuli). By contrast, a decreased inhibition for smoking-related stimuli (in comparison to control stimuli) was not observed for non-dependent smokers. Conclusions: Preferential processing of substance-related stimuli may indicate usage of a substance, whereas poor inhibitory control for substance-related stimuli may only emerge if dependence develops. The results suggest that how people engage with substance abuse is important for top-down attentional biases.

AB - Introduction: Substance use causes attentional biases for substance-related stimuli. Both bottom-up (preferential processing) and top-down (inhibitory control) processes are involved in attentional biases. We explored these aspects of attentional bias by using dependent and non-dependent cigarette smokers in order to see whether these two groups would differ in terms of general inhibitory control, bottom-up attentional bias, and top-down attentional biases. This enables us to see whether consumption behaviour would affect these cognitive responses to smoking-related stimuli. Methods: Smokers were categorised as either dependent (N=26) or non-dependent (N=34) smokers. A further group of non-smokers (N=32) were recruited to act as controls. Participants then completed a behavioural inhibition task with general stimuli, a smoking-related eye tracking version of the dot-probe task, and an eye-tracking inhibition task with smoking-related stimuli. Results: Results indicated that dependent smokers had decreased inhibition and increased attentional bias for smoking-related stimuli (and not control stimuli). By contrast, a decreased inhibition for smoking-related stimuli (in comparison to control stimuli) was not observed for non-dependent smokers. Conclusions: Preferential processing of substance-related stimuli may indicate usage of a substance, whereas poor inhibitory control for substance-related stimuli may only emerge if dependence develops. The results suggest that how people engage with substance abuse is important for top-down attentional biases.

KW - attentional bias

KW - incentive salience

KW - automaticity

KW - smoking

KW - inhibition

KW - inhibitory control

KW - dot-probe task

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886

M3 - Journal article

VL - 118

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

M1 - 106886

ER -