TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a diagnostic test for hidden hearing loss

AU - Plack, Christopher John

AU - Léger, Agnès

AU - Prendergast, Garreth

AU - Kluk, Karolina

AU - Guest, Hannah

AU - Munro, Kevin

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Cochlear synaptopathy (or “hidden hearing loss”), due to noise exposure or aging, has been demonstrated in animal models using histological techniques. However, diagnosis of the condition in individual humans is problematic because of: (i) test reliability, and (ii) lack of a gold standard validation measure. Wave I of the transient-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a non-invasive electrophysiological measure of auditory nerve function, and has been validated in the animal models. However, in humans Wave I amplitude shows high variability both between and within individuals. The frequency-following response (FFR), a sustained evoked potential reflecting synchronous neural activity in the rostral brainstem, is potentially more robust than ABR wave I. However, the FFR is a measure of central activity, and may be dependent on individual differences in central processing. Psychophysical measures are also affected by inter-subject variability in central processing. Differential measures may help to reduce inter-subject variability due to unrelated factors. A measure can be compared, within an individual, between conditions that are affected differently by cochlear synaptopathy. Validation of the metrics is also an issue. Comparisons with animal models, computational modeling, auditory nerve imaging, and human temporal bone histology are all potential options for validation, but there are technical and practical hurdles, and difficulties in interpretation. Despite the obstacles, a diagnostic test for hidden hearing loss is a worthwhile goal, with important implications for clinical practice and health surveillance.

AB - Cochlear synaptopathy (or “hidden hearing loss”), due to noise exposure or aging, has been demonstrated in animal models using histological techniques. However, diagnosis of the condition in individual humans is problematic because of: (i) test reliability, and (ii) lack of a gold standard validation measure. Wave I of the transient-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a non-invasive electrophysiological measure of auditory nerve function, and has been validated in the animal models. However, in humans Wave I amplitude shows high variability both between and within individuals. The frequency-following response (FFR), a sustained evoked potential reflecting synchronous neural activity in the rostral brainstem, is potentially more robust than ABR wave I. However, the FFR is a measure of central activity, and may be dependent on individual differences in central processing. Psychophysical measures are also affected by inter-subject variability in central processing. Differential measures may help to reduce inter-subject variability due to unrelated factors. A measure can be compared, within an individual, between conditions that are affected differently by cochlear synaptopathy. Validation of the metrics is also an issue. Comparisons with animal models, computational modeling, auditory nerve imaging, and human temporal bone histology are all potential options for validation, but there are technical and practical hurdles, and difficulties in interpretation. Despite the obstacles, a diagnostic test for hidden hearing loss is a worthwhile goal, with important implications for clinical practice and health surveillance.

KW - noise-induced hearing loss

KW - aging

KW - cochlear nerve

KW - auditory brainstem response

KW - frequency-following response

U2 - 10.1177/2331216516657466

DO - 10.1177/2331216516657466

M3 - Literature review

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Trends in Hearing

JF - Trends in Hearing

SN - 2331-2165

ER -