Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Toward a subjective measurement model for firm ...
View graph of relations

Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. / Santos, Juliana; Brito, Luis.
In: BAR : Brazilian Administration Review, Vol. 9, No. SI, 2012, p. 95-117.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Santos, J & Brito, L 2012, 'Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance', BAR : Brazilian Administration Review, vol. 9, no. SI, pp. 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007

APA

Santos, J., & Brito, L. (2012). Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. BAR : Brazilian Administration Review, 9(SI), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007

Vancouver

Santos J, Brito L. Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. BAR : Brazilian Administration Review. 2012;9(SI):95-117. doi: 10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007

Author

Santos, Juliana ; Brito, Luis. / Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. In: BAR : Brazilian Administration Review. 2012 ; Vol. 9, No. SI. pp. 95-117.

Bibtex

@article{48f607bb376c46d1a003d03796751200,
title = "Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance",
abstract = "Firm performance is a relevant construct in strategic management research and frequently used as a dependent variable. Despite this relevance, there is hardly a consensus about its definition, dimensionality and measurement, what limits advances in research and understanding of the concept. This article proposes and tests a measurement model for firm performance, based on subjective indicators. The model is grounded in stakeholder theory and a review of empirical articles. Confirmatory Factor Analyses, using data from 116 Brazilian senior managers, were used to test its fit and psychometric properties. The final model had six first-order dimensions: profitability, growth, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, social performance, and environmental performance. A second-order financial performance construct, influencing growth and profitability, correlated with the first-order intercorrelated, non-financial dimensions. Results suggest dimensions cannot be used interchangeably, since they represent different aspects of firm performance, and corroborate the idea that stakeholders have different demands that need to be managed independently. Researchers and practitioners may use the model to fully treat performance in empirical studies and to understand the impact of strategies on multiple performance facets.",
keywords = "firm performance, confirmatory factor analysis, measurement model, subjective indicators",
author = "Juliana Santos and Luis Brito",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "95--117",
journal = "BAR : Brazilian Administration Review",
issn = "1807-7692",
publisher = "Brazilian Administration Review",
number = "SI",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance

AU - Santos, Juliana

AU - Brito, Luis

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Firm performance is a relevant construct in strategic management research and frequently used as a dependent variable. Despite this relevance, there is hardly a consensus about its definition, dimensionality and measurement, what limits advances in research and understanding of the concept. This article proposes and tests a measurement model for firm performance, based on subjective indicators. The model is grounded in stakeholder theory and a review of empirical articles. Confirmatory Factor Analyses, using data from 116 Brazilian senior managers, were used to test its fit and psychometric properties. The final model had six first-order dimensions: profitability, growth, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, social performance, and environmental performance. A second-order financial performance construct, influencing growth and profitability, correlated with the first-order intercorrelated, non-financial dimensions. Results suggest dimensions cannot be used interchangeably, since they represent different aspects of firm performance, and corroborate the idea that stakeholders have different demands that need to be managed independently. Researchers and practitioners may use the model to fully treat performance in empirical studies and to understand the impact of strategies on multiple performance facets.

AB - Firm performance is a relevant construct in strategic management research and frequently used as a dependent variable. Despite this relevance, there is hardly a consensus about its definition, dimensionality and measurement, what limits advances in research and understanding of the concept. This article proposes and tests a measurement model for firm performance, based on subjective indicators. The model is grounded in stakeholder theory and a review of empirical articles. Confirmatory Factor Analyses, using data from 116 Brazilian senior managers, were used to test its fit and psychometric properties. The final model had six first-order dimensions: profitability, growth, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, social performance, and environmental performance. A second-order financial performance construct, influencing growth and profitability, correlated with the first-order intercorrelated, non-financial dimensions. Results suggest dimensions cannot be used interchangeably, since they represent different aspects of firm performance, and corroborate the idea that stakeholders have different demands that need to be managed independently. Researchers and practitioners may use the model to fully treat performance in empirical studies and to understand the impact of strategies on multiple performance facets.

KW - firm performance

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - measurement model

KW - subjective indicators

U2 - 10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007

DO - 10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 95

EP - 117

JO - BAR : Brazilian Administration Review

JF - BAR : Brazilian Administration Review

SN - 1807-7692

IS - SI

ER -