Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoe...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering. / Stephens, J.C.; Kashwan, P.; McLaren, D. et al.
In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 02.01.2023, p. 171-173.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Stephens, JC, Kashwan, P, McLaren, D & Surprise, K 2023, 'Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering', Environmental Politics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2156182

APA

Stephens, J. C., Kashwan, P., McLaren, D., & Surprise, K. (2023). Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering. Environmental Politics, 32(1), 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2156182

Vancouver

Stephens JC, Kashwan P, McLaren D, Surprise K. Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering. Environmental Politics. 2023 Jan 2;32(1):171-173. Epub 2022 Dec 18. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2022.2156182

Author

Stephens, J.C. ; Kashwan, P. ; McLaren, D. et al. / Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering. In: Environmental Politics. 2023 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 171-173.

Bibtex

@article{e8066975241a468283ca71ebedec64eb,
title = "Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering",
abstract = "As social scientists, we are concerned about the impact of the National Academies Report on solar geoengineering. It has already set into motion a major, federally coordinated national research program in the United States to develop this dangerous technology. We emphasize that scientists and researchers are not the ones who will be making decisions on deployment, so research and development should not proceed without integrating broader international perspectives. If the US government does not pause to establish effective international governance and public participation before investing more in solar geoengineering, then the NAS report will have–regardless of the intentions of the committee–opened the door for the US to unilaterally shape and advance the global development of solar geoengineering. ",
keywords = "climate justice, geoengineering, global governance, Solar geoengineering, unilateralism, United States",
author = "J.C. Stephens and P. Kashwan and D. McLaren and K. Surprise",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2022.2156182",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "171--173",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering

AU - Stephens, J.C.

AU - Kashwan, P.

AU - McLaren, D.

AU - Surprise, K.

PY - 2023/1/2

Y1 - 2023/1/2

N2 - As social scientists, we are concerned about the impact of the National Academies Report on solar geoengineering. It has already set into motion a major, federally coordinated national research program in the United States to develop this dangerous technology. We emphasize that scientists and researchers are not the ones who will be making decisions on deployment, so research and development should not proceed without integrating broader international perspectives. If the US government does not pause to establish effective international governance and public participation before investing more in solar geoengineering, then the NAS report will have–regardless of the intentions of the committee–opened the door for the US to unilaterally shape and advance the global development of solar geoengineering. 

AB - As social scientists, we are concerned about the impact of the National Academies Report on solar geoengineering. It has already set into motion a major, federally coordinated national research program in the United States to develop this dangerous technology. We emphasize that scientists and researchers are not the ones who will be making decisions on deployment, so research and development should not proceed without integrating broader international perspectives. If the US government does not pause to establish effective international governance and public participation before investing more in solar geoengineering, then the NAS report will have–regardless of the intentions of the committee–opened the door for the US to unilaterally shape and advance the global development of solar geoengineering. 

KW - climate justice

KW - geoengineering

KW - global governance

KW - Solar geoengineering

KW - unilateralism

KW - United States

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2022.2156182

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2022.2156182

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 171

EP - 173

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 1

ER -