Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Towards a ‘Social Model’ of Mental Capacity for...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Towards a ‘Social Model’ of Mental Capacity for Social Work

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Towards a ‘Social Model’ of Mental Capacity for Social Work. / Brown, Clare.
In: British Journal of Social Work, 15.11.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brown C. Towards a ‘Social Model’ of Mental Capacity for Social Work. British Journal of Social Work. 2023 Nov 15. Epub 2023 Nov 15. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcad242

Author

Bibtex

@article{887815377f59454785ae2796744bfa94,
title = "Towards a {\textquoteleft}Social Model{\textquoteright} of Mental Capacity for Social Work",
abstract = "The statutory social work role in England and Wales regularly involves assessment and {\textquoteleft}best interests{\textquoteright} decision making under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. Legal frameworks that permit substitute decision making have, however, been challenged as a contravention of the human rights of people with disabilities. This article aims to answer the question: {\textquoteleft}Can mental capacity be theorised for social work assessment in England and Wales in a way that is compatible with social work ethics and values?{\textquoteright} Findings are that mental capacity is a complex and disputed concept best described using a constructivist {\textquoteleft}social model{\textquoteright} which situates it as a property of an individual{\textquoteright}s relationships. Such a model suggests that assessments are a joint endeavour and that the quality of the relationship between assessor and assessed is crucial. The present legal framework disincentivises but does not prevent capacity assessment based on a social model. The existing literature suggests that further research might identify ways in which social work capacity assessment could enhance rather than diminish the autonomy of the people involved. These findings have implications for social work research, education and post qualification training.",
keywords = "Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Health (social science)",
author = "Clare Brown",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcad242",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a ‘Social Model’ of Mental Capacity for Social Work

AU - Brown, Clare

PY - 2023/11/15

Y1 - 2023/11/15

N2 - The statutory social work role in England and Wales regularly involves assessment and ‘best interests’ decision making under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. Legal frameworks that permit substitute decision making have, however, been challenged as a contravention of the human rights of people with disabilities. This article aims to answer the question: ‘Can mental capacity be theorised for social work assessment in England and Wales in a way that is compatible with social work ethics and values?’ Findings are that mental capacity is a complex and disputed concept best described using a constructivist ‘social model’ which situates it as a property of an individual’s relationships. Such a model suggests that assessments are a joint endeavour and that the quality of the relationship between assessor and assessed is crucial. The present legal framework disincentivises but does not prevent capacity assessment based on a social model. The existing literature suggests that further research might identify ways in which social work capacity assessment could enhance rather than diminish the autonomy of the people involved. These findings have implications for social work research, education and post qualification training.

AB - The statutory social work role in England and Wales regularly involves assessment and ‘best interests’ decision making under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. Legal frameworks that permit substitute decision making have, however, been challenged as a contravention of the human rights of people with disabilities. This article aims to answer the question: ‘Can mental capacity be theorised for social work assessment in England and Wales in a way that is compatible with social work ethics and values?’ Findings are that mental capacity is a complex and disputed concept best described using a constructivist ‘social model’ which situates it as a property of an individual’s relationships. Such a model suggests that assessments are a joint endeavour and that the quality of the relationship between assessor and assessed is crucial. The present legal framework disincentivises but does not prevent capacity assessment based on a social model. The existing literature suggests that further research might identify ways in which social work capacity assessment could enhance rather than diminish the autonomy of the people involved. These findings have implications for social work research, education and post qualification training.

KW - Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

KW - Health (social science)

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcad242

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcad242

M3 - Journal article

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

ER -