Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cambridge Review of International Affairs on 11/09/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978
Accepted author manuscript, 195 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards global relational theorizing
T2 - a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relationalism
AU - Nordin, Astrid
AU - Smith, Graham M.
AU - Bunskoek, Raoul
AU - Huang, Chiung-chiu
AU - Hwang, Yie-jye
AU - Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus
AU - Kavalski, Emilian
AU - Ling, L. H. M.
AU - Martindale, Leigh
AU - Nakamura, Mari
AU - Nexon, Daniel
AU - Premack, Laura
AU - Qin, Yaqing
AU - Shih, Chih-yu
AU - Tyfield, David
AU - Williams, Emma
AU - Zalewski, Marysia
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cambridge Review of International Affairs on 11/09/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978
PY - 2019/9/11
Y1 - 2019/9/11
N2 - What is ‘relational theorizing’ in International Relations and what can it offer? This article introduces a thematic section that responds to these questions by showing two things. First, relational theorizing is not a doctrine or a method, but a set of analyses that begin with relations rather than the putative essences of constitutively autonomous actors. Second, relational theorizing has emerged from different geo-linguistic traditions, and a relational approach to International Relations (IR) can offer the language and space for increased and productive engagement beyond Anglophone scholarship. This thematic section takes a significant step in this direction by staging a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relational IR theorizing. Such an engagement shows points of comparison and contrast, convergence and divergence. In this way, the essays presented here contribute to developing a more ‘global’ IR.
AB - What is ‘relational theorizing’ in International Relations and what can it offer? This article introduces a thematic section that responds to these questions by showing two things. First, relational theorizing is not a doctrine or a method, but a set of analyses that begin with relations rather than the putative essences of constitutively autonomous actors. Second, relational theorizing has emerged from different geo-linguistic traditions, and a relational approach to International Relations (IR) can offer the language and space for increased and productive engagement beyond Anglophone scholarship. This thematic section takes a significant step in this direction by staging a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relational IR theorizing. Such an engagement shows points of comparison and contrast, convergence and divergence. In this way, the essays presented here contribute to developing a more ‘global’ IR.
U2 - 10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978
DO - 10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978
M3 - Journal article
JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs
JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs
SN - 0955-7571
ER -