Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Towards Solving the Challenge of Minimal Overhe...

Electronic data

  • Full text

    Rights statement: Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only. ICPE ’23 Companion, April 15–19, 2023, Coimbra, Portugal © 2023 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM ISBN 979-8-4007-0072-9/23/04. . . $15.00

    Accepted author manuscript, 497 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: Other

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Towards Solving the Challenge of Minimal Overhead Monitoring

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Close
Publication date15/04/2023
Host publicationICPE 2023 - Companion of the 2023 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherACM
Pages381-388
Number of pages8
ISBN (electronic)9798400700729
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The examination of performance changes or the performance behavior of a software requires the measurement of the performance. This is done via probes, i.e., pieces of code which obtain and process measurement data, and which are inserted into the examined application. The execution of those probes in a singular method creates overhead, which deteriorates performance measurements of calling methods and slows down the measurement process. Therefore, an important challenge for performance measurement is the reduction of the measurement overhead. To address this challenge, the overhead should be minimized. Based on an analysis of the sources of performance overhead, we derive the following four optimization options: (1) Source instrumentation instead of AspectJ instrumentation, (2) reduction of measurement data, (3) change of the queue and (4) aggregation of measurement data. We evaluate the effect of these optimization options using the MooBench benchmark. Thereby, we show that these optimizations options reduce the monitoring overhead of the monitoring framework Kieker. For MooBench, the execution duration could be reduced from 4.77 μs to 0.39 μs per method invocation on average.

Bibliographic note

.