Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Traces of a mobile field

Electronic data

  • Faulconbridge_Hui_Special_issue_introduction_Author_Accepted_Manuscript_plain_text

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Mobilities on 08/01/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534

    Accepted author manuscript, 193 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Traces of a mobile field: ten years of mobilities research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Published

Standard

Traces of a mobile field : ten years of mobilities research. / Faulconbridge, James; Hui, Allison.

In: Mobilities, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.2016, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{bdd946ea05ff447680fbf8136252c8e5,
title = "Traces of a mobile field: ten years of mobilities research",
abstract = "Since the launch of this journal ten years ago, the field of mobilities research has developed at a rapid pace. In this editorial introduction we explore how this development has been curated, how the field has evolved, and what maturation might mean for mobilities research. After reviewing how early editorials encouraged particular trajectories of development within mobilities research, we introduce the papers in this special issue, which build upon and re-shape key discussions that have emerged in the last decade. Drawing out issues of power, interdisciplinarity, social processes and futures, the papers raise important questions about not only how understandings of mobilities are changing, but also how the field of mobilities research is itself on the move. Taking up these themes, we examine how understanding mobilities research as a field, following Bourdieu (1984), contributes to considerations of the potential for future struggles, fragmentation, and sub-disciplines. We argue that the open nature and strategic diversity of the mobilities field has fed the successes of the past decade, and therefore needs to remain a priority in the future – with a careful balance curated between convergence around key themes and the exploration of varied {\textquoteleft}internal goods{\textquoteright} (MacIntyre 1985) which remain an important source of inspiration and creative potential within the field. ",
keywords = "mobilities, fields, futures, internal goods, interdisciplinary, power, academic practices",
author = "James Faulconbridge and Allison Hui",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Mobilities on 08/01/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Mobilities",
issn = "1745-0101",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traces of a mobile field

T2 - ten years of mobilities research

AU - Faulconbridge, James

AU - Hui, Allison

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Mobilities on 08/01/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Since the launch of this journal ten years ago, the field of mobilities research has developed at a rapid pace. In this editorial introduction we explore how this development has been curated, how the field has evolved, and what maturation might mean for mobilities research. After reviewing how early editorials encouraged particular trajectories of development within mobilities research, we introduce the papers in this special issue, which build upon and re-shape key discussions that have emerged in the last decade. Drawing out issues of power, interdisciplinarity, social processes and futures, the papers raise important questions about not only how understandings of mobilities are changing, but also how the field of mobilities research is itself on the move. Taking up these themes, we examine how understanding mobilities research as a field, following Bourdieu (1984), contributes to considerations of the potential for future struggles, fragmentation, and sub-disciplines. We argue that the open nature and strategic diversity of the mobilities field has fed the successes of the past decade, and therefore needs to remain a priority in the future – with a careful balance curated between convergence around key themes and the exploration of varied ‘internal goods’ (MacIntyre 1985) which remain an important source of inspiration and creative potential within the field.

AB - Since the launch of this journal ten years ago, the field of mobilities research has developed at a rapid pace. In this editorial introduction we explore how this development has been curated, how the field has evolved, and what maturation might mean for mobilities research. After reviewing how early editorials encouraged particular trajectories of development within mobilities research, we introduce the papers in this special issue, which build upon and re-shape key discussions that have emerged in the last decade. Drawing out issues of power, interdisciplinarity, social processes and futures, the papers raise important questions about not only how understandings of mobilities are changing, but also how the field of mobilities research is itself on the move. Taking up these themes, we examine how understanding mobilities research as a field, following Bourdieu (1984), contributes to considerations of the potential for future struggles, fragmentation, and sub-disciplines. We argue that the open nature and strategic diversity of the mobilities field has fed the successes of the past decade, and therefore needs to remain a priority in the future – with a careful balance curated between convergence around key themes and the exploration of varied ‘internal goods’ (MacIntyre 1985) which remain an important source of inspiration and creative potential within the field.

KW - mobilities

KW - fields

KW - futures

KW - internal goods

KW - interdisciplinary

KW - power

KW - academic practices

U2 - 10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534

DO - 10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534

M3 - Editorial

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Mobilities

JF - Mobilities

SN - 1745-0101

IS - 1

ER -