Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Trade liberalization and antidumping
View graph of relations

Trade liberalization and antidumping: is there a substitution effect?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Trade liberalization and antidumping: is there a substitution effect? / Moore, Michael O.; Zanardi, Maurizio.
In: Review of Development Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2011, p. 601-619.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Moore, MO & Zanardi, M 2011, 'Trade liberalization and antidumping: is there a substitution effect?', Review of Development Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 601-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x

APA

Moore, M. O., & Zanardi, M. (2011). Trade liberalization and antidumping: is there a substitution effect? Review of Development Economics, 15(4), 601-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x

Vancouver

Moore MO, Zanardi M. Trade liberalization and antidumping: is there a substitution effect? Review of Development Economics. 2011;15(4):601-619. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x

Author

Moore, Michael O. ; Zanardi, Maurizio. / Trade liberalization and antidumping : is there a substitution effect?. In: Review of Development Economics. 2011 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 601-619.

Bibtex

@article{2fe0e195ab974004ac1c8c894b997469,
title = "Trade liberalization and antidumping: is there a substitution effect?",
abstract = "Many nations have undergone significant trade liberalization even as they have increased their use of contingent protection measures. This raises the question of whether some of the trade liberalization efforts, at times accomplished through painful reforms, have been undone through a substitution from tariffs to non-tariff barriers. Among the new forms of protection, antidumping is the most relevant. This paper examines whether the use of antidumping is systematically influenced by the reduction of applied sectoral tariffs in a sample of 29 developing and six developed countries from 1991 through 2002. Evidence is found of a substitution effect only for a small set of heavy users of antidumping among developing countries. There is no similar statistically significant result for other developing countries or developed countries. Robust evidence is also found of retaliation and deflection effects as determinant of antidumping filings across all subsamples.",
author = "Moore, {Michael O.} and Maurizio Zanardi",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "601--619",
journal = "Review of Development Economics",
issn = "1363-6669",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trade liberalization and antidumping

T2 - is there a substitution effect?

AU - Moore, Michael O.

AU - Zanardi, Maurizio

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Many nations have undergone significant trade liberalization even as they have increased their use of contingent protection measures. This raises the question of whether some of the trade liberalization efforts, at times accomplished through painful reforms, have been undone through a substitution from tariffs to non-tariff barriers. Among the new forms of protection, antidumping is the most relevant. This paper examines whether the use of antidumping is systematically influenced by the reduction of applied sectoral tariffs in a sample of 29 developing and six developed countries from 1991 through 2002. Evidence is found of a substitution effect only for a small set of heavy users of antidumping among developing countries. There is no similar statistically significant result for other developing countries or developed countries. Robust evidence is also found of retaliation and deflection effects as determinant of antidumping filings across all subsamples.

AB - Many nations have undergone significant trade liberalization even as they have increased their use of contingent protection measures. This raises the question of whether some of the trade liberalization efforts, at times accomplished through painful reforms, have been undone through a substitution from tariffs to non-tariff barriers. Among the new forms of protection, antidumping is the most relevant. This paper examines whether the use of antidumping is systematically influenced by the reduction of applied sectoral tariffs in a sample of 29 developing and six developed countries from 1991 through 2002. Evidence is found of a substitution effect only for a small set of heavy users of antidumping among developing countries. There is no similar statistically significant result for other developing countries or developed countries. Robust evidence is also found of retaliation and deflection effects as determinant of antidumping filings across all subsamples.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00630.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 601

EP - 619

JO - Review of Development Economics

JF - Review of Development Economics

SN - 1363-6669

IS - 4

ER -