Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Trading volume and liquidity provision in crypt...

Electronic data

  • Babiak Trading Volume

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Banking and Finance. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Banking and Finance, 142, 106547, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106547

    Accepted author manuscript, 675 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Trading volume and liquidity provision in cryptocurrency markets

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
Article number106547
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/09/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Banking and Finance
Volume142
Number of pages15
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date26/05/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

We provide empirical evidence within the context of cryptocurrency markets that the returns from liquidity provision, proxied by the returns of a short-term reversal strategy, are primarily concentrated in trading pairs with lower levels of market activity. Empirically, we focus on a moderately large cross section of cryptocurrency pairs traded against the U.S. Dollar from March 1, 2017 to March 1, 2022 on multiple centralised exchanges. Our findings suggest that expected returns from liquidity provision are amplified in smaller, more volatile, and less liquid cryptocurrency pairs, where fear of adverse selection might be higher. A panel regression analysis confirms that the interaction between lagged returns and trading volume contains significant predictive information for the dynamics of cryptocurrency returns. This is consistent with theories that highlight the roles of inventory risk and adverse selection for liquidity provision.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Banking and Finance. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Banking and Finance, 142, 106547, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106547