Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for...
View graph of relations

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults. / Robb, Karen; Bennett, Michael I.; Johnson, Mark I. et al.

In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 2008, No. 6, 2008, p. CD006276.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Robb, K, Bennett, MI, Johnson, MI, Simpson, KH & Oxberry, SG 2008, 'Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults.', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2008, no. 6, pp. CD006276. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.

APA

Robb, K., Bennett, M. I., Johnson, M. I., Simpson, K. H., & Oxberry, S. G. (2008). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2008(6), CD006276. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.

Vancouver

Robb K, Bennett MI, Johnson MI, Simpson KH, Oxberry SG. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;2008(6):CD006276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.

Author

Robb, Karen ; Bennett, Michael I. ; Johnson, Mark I. et al. / Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008 ; Vol. 2008, No. 6. pp. CD006276.

Bibtex

@article{e54145cb222d4eddb611acf76effb8d9,
title = "Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults.",
abstract = "Background Cancer-related pain is complex and multi-dimensional but the mainstay of cancer pain management has predominately used a biomedical approach. There is a need for non-pharmacological and innovative approaches. Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) may have a role for a significant number of patients but the effectiveness of TENS is currently unknown. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of TENS for cancer-related pain in adults. Search strategy We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and PEDRO databases (11/04/08). Selection criteria Only randomised controlled trials (RCTS) investigating the use of TENS for the management of cancer-related pain in adults were included. Data collection and analysis The search strategy identified 37 possible published studies which were divided between two pairs of review authors that decided on study selection. A study eligibility form was used to screen each abstract and where study eligibility could not be determined from the abstract, the full paper was obtained and assessed by one pair of review authors. A standardised data extraction sheet was used to collect information on the studies and the quality of the studies was assessed independently by two review authors using the validated five-point Oxford Quality Scale. Final scores were discussed and agreed between all four review authors. The small sample sizes and differences in patient study populations of the two included studies prevented meta-analysis. Main results Only two RCTs met the eligibility criteria (64 participants). These studies were heterogenous with respect to study population, sample size, study design, methodological quality, mode of TENS, treatment duration, method of administration and outcome measures used. In one RCT, there were no significant differences between TENS and placebo in women with chronic pain secondary to breast cancer treatment. In the other RCT, there were no significant differences between acupuncture-type TENS and sham in palliative care patients; this study was underpowered. Authors' conclusions The results of this systematic review are inconclusive due to a lack of suitable RCTs. Large multi-centre RCTs are required to assess the value of TENS in the management of cancer-related pain in adults.",
author = "Karen Robb and Bennett, {Michael I.} and Johnson, {Mark I.} and Simpson, {Karen H.} and Oxberry, {Stephen G.}",
note = "This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 6. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.{\textquoteright} Robb KA, Bennett MI, Johnson MI, Simpson KJ, Oxberry SG. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006276. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.",
language = "English",
volume = "2008",
pages = "CD006276",
journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",
issn = "1469-493X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for cancer pain in adults.

AU - Robb, Karen

AU - Bennett, Michael I.

AU - Johnson, Mark I.

AU - Simpson, Karen H.

AU - Oxberry, Stephen G.

N1 - This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 6. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.’ Robb KA, Bennett MI, Johnson MI, Simpson KJ, Oxberry SG. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006276. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Background Cancer-related pain is complex and multi-dimensional but the mainstay of cancer pain management has predominately used a biomedical approach. There is a need for non-pharmacological and innovative approaches. Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) may have a role for a significant number of patients but the effectiveness of TENS is currently unknown. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of TENS for cancer-related pain in adults. Search strategy We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and PEDRO databases (11/04/08). Selection criteria Only randomised controlled trials (RCTS) investigating the use of TENS for the management of cancer-related pain in adults were included. Data collection and analysis The search strategy identified 37 possible published studies which were divided between two pairs of review authors that decided on study selection. A study eligibility form was used to screen each abstract and where study eligibility could not be determined from the abstract, the full paper was obtained and assessed by one pair of review authors. A standardised data extraction sheet was used to collect information on the studies and the quality of the studies was assessed independently by two review authors using the validated five-point Oxford Quality Scale. Final scores were discussed and agreed between all four review authors. The small sample sizes and differences in patient study populations of the two included studies prevented meta-analysis. Main results Only two RCTs met the eligibility criteria (64 participants). These studies were heterogenous with respect to study population, sample size, study design, methodological quality, mode of TENS, treatment duration, method of administration and outcome measures used. In one RCT, there were no significant differences between TENS and placebo in women with chronic pain secondary to breast cancer treatment. In the other RCT, there were no significant differences between acupuncture-type TENS and sham in palliative care patients; this study was underpowered. Authors' conclusions The results of this systematic review are inconclusive due to a lack of suitable RCTs. Large multi-centre RCTs are required to assess the value of TENS in the management of cancer-related pain in adults.

AB - Background Cancer-related pain is complex and multi-dimensional but the mainstay of cancer pain management has predominately used a biomedical approach. There is a need for non-pharmacological and innovative approaches. Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) may have a role for a significant number of patients but the effectiveness of TENS is currently unknown. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of TENS for cancer-related pain in adults. Search strategy We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and PEDRO databases (11/04/08). Selection criteria Only randomised controlled trials (RCTS) investigating the use of TENS for the management of cancer-related pain in adults were included. Data collection and analysis The search strategy identified 37 possible published studies which were divided between two pairs of review authors that decided on study selection. A study eligibility form was used to screen each abstract and where study eligibility could not be determined from the abstract, the full paper was obtained and assessed by one pair of review authors. A standardised data extraction sheet was used to collect information on the studies and the quality of the studies was assessed independently by two review authors using the validated five-point Oxford Quality Scale. Final scores were discussed and agreed between all four review authors. The small sample sizes and differences in patient study populations of the two included studies prevented meta-analysis. Main results Only two RCTs met the eligibility criteria (64 participants). These studies were heterogenous with respect to study population, sample size, study design, methodological quality, mode of TENS, treatment duration, method of administration and outcome measures used. In one RCT, there were no significant differences between TENS and placebo in women with chronic pain secondary to breast cancer treatment. In the other RCT, there were no significant differences between acupuncture-type TENS and sham in palliative care patients; this study was underpowered. Authors' conclusions The results of this systematic review are inconclusive due to a lack of suitable RCTs. Large multi-centre RCTs are required to assess the value of TENS in the management of cancer-related pain in adults.

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub2.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2008

SP - CD006276

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

SN - 1469-493X

IS - 6

ER -