Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Transient energy storage systems for fast frequ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response: Power‐train considerations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response: Power‐train considerations. / Hu, Yiheng; Schofield, Nigel; Zhao, Nan.
In: IET Renewable Power Generation, Vol. 18, No. S1, 18.12.2024, p. 4679-4688.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hu, Y, Schofield, N & Zhao, N 2024, 'Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response: Power‐train considerations', IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 18, no. S1, pp. 4679-4688. https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13175

APA

Vancouver

Hu Y, Schofield N, Zhao N. Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response: Power‐train considerations. IET Renewable Power Generation. 2024 Dec 18;18(S1):4679-4688. Epub 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1049/rpg2.13175

Author

Hu, Yiheng ; Schofield, Nigel ; Zhao, Nan. / Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response : Power‐train considerations. In: IET Renewable Power Generation. 2024 ; Vol. 18, No. S1. pp. 4679-4688.

Bibtex

@article{d04cf2d29da54fd39ac75e5a3a36a216,
title = "Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response: Power‐train considerations",
abstract = "Renewable energy sources generate power intermittently, which poses challenges in meeting power demand. The use of transient energy storage systems (TESSs) has proven to be an effective solution to this issue. Hence, it is crucial to understand the impact of TESS components design on sizing the power‐train system during fast frequency response. While power‐train systems have been extensively discussed, the impact of dc‐link voltage on the TESS power‐* train and associated power electronics specification requirements has not been evaluated. This study uses a sodium‐nickel chloride (NaNiCl2) battery‐based TESS to assess different power‐train options. Specifically, the research investigates the impact of variations in dc‐link voltage due to battery regulation and state‐of‐charge (SoC) on the design of the TESS‐connected power‐train system, since these will be the major contributions to the power‐train system performance envelope. This paper also compares the performance of TESS power‐train systems with four different schemes. The power‐train models include the detailed modelling of energy sources, power electronic converters, and transformers based on published parameters and testing data. Additionally, the study proposes a performance index to evaluate the superiority of the four schemes in terms of voltage and current rating, efficiency and battery size.",
keywords = "energy storage, energy storage technology, power system analysis computing",
author = "Yiheng Hu and Nigel Schofield and Nan Zhao",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1049/rpg2.13175",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "4679--4688",
journal = "IET Renewable Power Generation",
issn = "1752-1416",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "S1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transient energy storage systems for fast frequency response

T2 - Power‐train considerations

AU - Hu, Yiheng

AU - Schofield, Nigel

AU - Zhao, Nan

PY - 2024/12/18

Y1 - 2024/12/18

N2 - Renewable energy sources generate power intermittently, which poses challenges in meeting power demand. The use of transient energy storage systems (TESSs) has proven to be an effective solution to this issue. Hence, it is crucial to understand the impact of TESS components design on sizing the power‐train system during fast frequency response. While power‐train systems have been extensively discussed, the impact of dc‐link voltage on the TESS power‐* train and associated power electronics specification requirements has not been evaluated. This study uses a sodium‐nickel chloride (NaNiCl2) battery‐based TESS to assess different power‐train options. Specifically, the research investigates the impact of variations in dc‐link voltage due to battery regulation and state‐of‐charge (SoC) on the design of the TESS‐connected power‐train system, since these will be the major contributions to the power‐train system performance envelope. This paper also compares the performance of TESS power‐train systems with four different schemes. The power‐train models include the detailed modelling of energy sources, power electronic converters, and transformers based on published parameters and testing data. Additionally, the study proposes a performance index to evaluate the superiority of the four schemes in terms of voltage and current rating, efficiency and battery size.

AB - Renewable energy sources generate power intermittently, which poses challenges in meeting power demand. The use of transient energy storage systems (TESSs) has proven to be an effective solution to this issue. Hence, it is crucial to understand the impact of TESS components design on sizing the power‐train system during fast frequency response. While power‐train systems have been extensively discussed, the impact of dc‐link voltage on the TESS power‐* train and associated power electronics specification requirements has not been evaluated. This study uses a sodium‐nickel chloride (NaNiCl2) battery‐based TESS to assess different power‐train options. Specifically, the research investigates the impact of variations in dc‐link voltage due to battery regulation and state‐of‐charge (SoC) on the design of the TESS‐connected power‐train system, since these will be the major contributions to the power‐train system performance envelope. This paper also compares the performance of TESS power‐train systems with four different schemes. The power‐train models include the detailed modelling of energy sources, power electronic converters, and transformers based on published parameters and testing data. Additionally, the study proposes a performance index to evaluate the superiority of the four schemes in terms of voltage and current rating, efficiency and battery size.

KW - energy storage

KW - energy storage technology

KW - power system analysis computing

U2 - 10.1049/rpg2.13175

DO - 10.1049/rpg2.13175

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 4679

EP - 4688

JO - IET Renewable Power Generation

JF - IET Renewable Power Generation

SN - 1752-1416

IS - S1

ER -