Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Transparency and reciprocity

Research

Electronic data

  • 2016_Transparency_and_Reciprocity

    Accepted author manuscript, 399 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Transparency and reciprocity: Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Transparency and reciprocity: Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research. / Fathallah, Judith.
In: The Journal of Fandom Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 251-254.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Fathallah, J 2016, 'Transparency and reciprocity: Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research', The Journal of Fandom Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.4.3.251_1

APA

Fathallah, J. (2016). Transparency and reciprocity: Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research. The Journal of Fandom Studies, 4(3), 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.4.3.251_1

Vancouver

Fathallah J. Transparency and reciprocity: Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research. The Journal of Fandom Studies. 2016 Sept 1;4(3):251-254. doi: 10.1386/jfs.4.3.251_1

Author

Fathallah, Judith. / Transparency and reciprocity : Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research. In: The Journal of Fandom Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 251-254.

Bibtex

@article{40a2afb676ec4ebe83230f481c4bb6e7,
title = "Transparency and reciprocity: Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research",
abstract = "Accountability to participants is a topic of some debate within fan studies. Whilst working with people requires informed consent, it may be legally defensible to freely quote any fan work found online. Reflecting on my research experience, this article argues for a responsibility to ask permission from fan creators before sharing their work in academic and other contexts. An ethics of transparency is beneficial not only to fans, I argue, but to the development of fan studies and its continued dialogue with fandoms.",
author = "Judith Fathallah",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/jfs.4.3.251_1",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "251--254",
journal = "The Journal of Fandom Studies",
issn = "2046-6692",
publisher = "Intellect",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency and reciprocity

T2 - Respecting fannish spaces in scholarly research

AU - Fathallah, Judith

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Accountability to participants is a topic of some debate within fan studies. Whilst working with people requires informed consent, it may be legally defensible to freely quote any fan work found online. Reflecting on my research experience, this article argues for a responsibility to ask permission from fan creators before sharing their work in academic and other contexts. An ethics of transparency is beneficial not only to fans, I argue, but to the development of fan studies and its continued dialogue with fandoms.

AB - Accountability to participants is a topic of some debate within fan studies. Whilst working with people requires informed consent, it may be legally defensible to freely quote any fan work found online. Reflecting on my research experience, this article argues for a responsibility to ask permission from fan creators before sharing their work in academic and other contexts. An ethics of transparency is beneficial not only to fans, I argue, but to the development of fan studies and its continued dialogue with fandoms.

U2 - 10.1386/jfs.4.3.251_1

DO - 10.1386/jfs.4.3.251_1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 251

EP - 254

JO - The Journal of Fandom Studies

JF - The Journal of Fandom Studies

SN - 2046-6692

IS - 3

ER -