Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Treatment of Childhood Obesity

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review. / Staniford, Leanne J.; Breckon, Jeff D.; Copeland, Robert J.
In: Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4, 08.2012, p. 545-564.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Staniford, LJ, Breckon, JD & Copeland, RJ 2012, 'Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review', Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9507-7

APA

Staniford, L. J., Breckon, J. D., & Copeland, R. J. (2012). Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(4), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9507-7

Vancouver

Staniford LJ, Breckon JD, Copeland RJ. Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2012 Aug;21(4):545-564. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9507-7

Author

Staniford, Leanne J. ; Breckon, Jeff D. ; Copeland, Robert J. / Treatment of Childhood Obesity : A Systematic Review. In: Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 545-564.

Bibtex

@article{e01f7e70e40b47e5bccdb9ac7b7577a5,
title = "Treatment of Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Childhood obesity trends have increased dramatically over the past three decade's. The purpose of this quantitative systematic review is to provide an update of the evidence, illustrating the efficacy of childhood obesity treatment, considering whether treatment fidelity has been measured and/or reported and whether this related to the treatment effect size. Searches revealed 61 relevant articles published from January 2000 to 2009, including both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of childhood and adolescent obesity treatment interventions. The review identified scant measurement and reporting of issues around treatment fidelity, an increase in the number of interventions outside of the US, (particularly across Europe) and an emergence of studies involving older children and adolescents in a range of settings. Interventions comprising a dietary, exercise, and behavioral component, supported by family involvement and delivered by trained interventionists in specialized or supervised settings, appeared to offer a potentially effective treatment for obesity. However, concern remains over study quality (particularly sample size), dropout rates and study design. Variations in outcome measures and intervention designs means generalizable conclusions cannot be easily be made. Of greater concern is the lack of consideration for treatment fidelity, which has implications for the transfer of knowledge and the reliability of interventions. Conclusions from the review include; the need for increased accuracy of reporting and objective measurement of treatment fidelity; the need for further investigation of potential cost-effective treatment options (including maintenance strategies to enhance sustainability of current interventions); and an increase in the number of longitudinal trials beyond 1 year in duration.",
keywords = "Child/Adolescent, Overweight/Obesity, Treatment",
author = "Staniford, {Leanne J.} and Breckon, {Jeff D.} and Copeland, {Robert J.}",
year = "2012",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1007/s10826-011-9507-7",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "545--564",
journal = "Journal of Child and Family Studies",
issn = "1062-1024",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of Childhood Obesity

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Staniford, Leanne J.

AU - Breckon, Jeff D.

AU - Copeland, Robert J.

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Childhood obesity trends have increased dramatically over the past three decade's. The purpose of this quantitative systematic review is to provide an update of the evidence, illustrating the efficacy of childhood obesity treatment, considering whether treatment fidelity has been measured and/or reported and whether this related to the treatment effect size. Searches revealed 61 relevant articles published from January 2000 to 2009, including both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of childhood and adolescent obesity treatment interventions. The review identified scant measurement and reporting of issues around treatment fidelity, an increase in the number of interventions outside of the US, (particularly across Europe) and an emergence of studies involving older children and adolescents in a range of settings. Interventions comprising a dietary, exercise, and behavioral component, supported by family involvement and delivered by trained interventionists in specialized or supervised settings, appeared to offer a potentially effective treatment for obesity. However, concern remains over study quality (particularly sample size), dropout rates and study design. Variations in outcome measures and intervention designs means generalizable conclusions cannot be easily be made. Of greater concern is the lack of consideration for treatment fidelity, which has implications for the transfer of knowledge and the reliability of interventions. Conclusions from the review include; the need for increased accuracy of reporting and objective measurement of treatment fidelity; the need for further investigation of potential cost-effective treatment options (including maintenance strategies to enhance sustainability of current interventions); and an increase in the number of longitudinal trials beyond 1 year in duration.

AB - Childhood obesity trends have increased dramatically over the past three decade's. The purpose of this quantitative systematic review is to provide an update of the evidence, illustrating the efficacy of childhood obesity treatment, considering whether treatment fidelity has been measured and/or reported and whether this related to the treatment effect size. Searches revealed 61 relevant articles published from January 2000 to 2009, including both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of childhood and adolescent obesity treatment interventions. The review identified scant measurement and reporting of issues around treatment fidelity, an increase in the number of interventions outside of the US, (particularly across Europe) and an emergence of studies involving older children and adolescents in a range of settings. Interventions comprising a dietary, exercise, and behavioral component, supported by family involvement and delivered by trained interventionists in specialized or supervised settings, appeared to offer a potentially effective treatment for obesity. However, concern remains over study quality (particularly sample size), dropout rates and study design. Variations in outcome measures and intervention designs means generalizable conclusions cannot be easily be made. Of greater concern is the lack of consideration for treatment fidelity, which has implications for the transfer of knowledge and the reliability of interventions. Conclusions from the review include; the need for increased accuracy of reporting and objective measurement of treatment fidelity; the need for further investigation of potential cost-effective treatment options (including maintenance strategies to enhance sustainability of current interventions); and an increase in the number of longitudinal trials beyond 1 year in duration.

KW - Child/Adolescent

KW - Overweight/Obesity

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864285206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10826-011-9507-7

DO - 10.1007/s10826-011-9507-7

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84864285206

VL - 21

SP - 545

EP - 564

JO - Journal of Child and Family Studies

JF - Journal of Child and Family Studies

SN - 1062-1024

IS - 4

ER -