Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acqui...

Electronic data

  • Triggering Innovation

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Group & Organization Management, 42, (2), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Group & Organization Management page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/GOM on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 844 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Shared Mental Models.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Shared Mental Models. / Dao, Mai Anh; Strobl, Andreas; Bauer, Florian et al.
In: Group and Organization Management, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 195-236.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dao MA, Strobl A, Bauer F, Tarba SY. Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Shared Mental Models. Group and Organization Management. 2017 Apr 1;42(2):195-236. Epub 2017 Mar 21. doi: 10.1177/1059601117696573

Author

Dao, Mai Anh ; Strobl, Andreas ; Bauer, Florian et al. / Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acquisitions : The Role of Shared Mental Models. In: Group and Organization Management. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 195-236.

Bibtex

@article{f66c50a629c54f3fbd54db8b3f57dc24,
title = "Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Shared Mental Models.",
abstract = "In this article, we analyze how shared team and task mental models, developed prior to an acquisition, affect exploration and exploitation activities in the postacquisition phase, and how these effects are dependent on relative size. With a sample of 101 transactions of acquirers from the German-speaking part of Europe, we provide empirical evidence that both shared team and task mental models positively influence exploitation activities following an acquisition, whereby only shared team mental models (TMMs) are beneficial for exploration. We provide empirical evidence that shared mental models in terms of task and team are an important informal source for enhancing exploration and exploitation innovation activities. However, this source of informal coordination is contextual. Although the relationships on exploitation are stable, the beneficial effect of TMMs on exploration is sensitive and devitalized by an increasing relative size. Implications for further research and management practice are given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]",
keywords = "Ambidexterity, Competitive advantage, Consolidation & merger of corporations, Organizational learning, Technological innovations, exploration and exploitation, innovation, mental models, mergers and acquisitions, relative standing",
author = "Dao, {Mai Anh} and Andreas Strobl and Florian Bauer and Tarba, {Shlomo Y}",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Group & Organization Management, 42, (2), 2017, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Group & Organization Management page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/GOM on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1059601117696573",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "195--236",
journal = "Group and Organization Management",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Triggering Innovation Through Mergers and Acquisitions

T2 - The Role of Shared Mental Models.

AU - Dao, Mai Anh

AU - Strobl, Andreas

AU - Bauer, Florian

AU - Tarba, Shlomo Y

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Group & Organization Management, 42, (2), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Group & Organization Management page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/GOM on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - In this article, we analyze how shared team and task mental models, developed prior to an acquisition, affect exploration and exploitation activities in the postacquisition phase, and how these effects are dependent on relative size. With a sample of 101 transactions of acquirers from the German-speaking part of Europe, we provide empirical evidence that both shared team and task mental models positively influence exploitation activities following an acquisition, whereby only shared team mental models (TMMs) are beneficial for exploration. We provide empirical evidence that shared mental models in terms of task and team are an important informal source for enhancing exploration and exploitation innovation activities. However, this source of informal coordination is contextual. Although the relationships on exploitation are stable, the beneficial effect of TMMs on exploration is sensitive and devitalized by an increasing relative size. Implications for further research and management practice are given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AB - In this article, we analyze how shared team and task mental models, developed prior to an acquisition, affect exploration and exploitation activities in the postacquisition phase, and how these effects are dependent on relative size. With a sample of 101 transactions of acquirers from the German-speaking part of Europe, we provide empirical evidence that both shared team and task mental models positively influence exploitation activities following an acquisition, whereby only shared team mental models (TMMs) are beneficial for exploration. We provide empirical evidence that shared mental models in terms of task and team are an important informal source for enhancing exploration and exploitation innovation activities. However, this source of informal coordination is contextual. Although the relationships on exploitation are stable, the beneficial effect of TMMs on exploration is sensitive and devitalized by an increasing relative size. Implications for further research and management practice are given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

KW - Ambidexterity

KW - Competitive advantage

KW - Consolidation & merger of corporations

KW - Organizational learning

KW - Technological innovations

KW - exploration and exploitation

KW - innovation

KW - mental models

KW - mergers and acquisitions

KW - relative standing

U2 - 10.1177/1059601117696573

DO - 10.1177/1059601117696573

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 195

EP - 236

JO - Group and Organization Management

JF - Group and Organization Management

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 2

ER -