Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetic...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetics, Darmstadt 1970-1972.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetics, Darmstadt 1970-1972. / Iddon, Martin.
In: Twentieth-Century Music, Vol. 3, No. 2, 09.2006, p. 255-275.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Iddon M. Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetics, Darmstadt 1970-1972. Twentieth-Century Music. 2006 Sept;3(2):255-275. doi: 10.1017/S1478572207000485

Author

Iddon, Martin. / Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetics, Darmstadt 1970-1972. In: Twentieth-Century Music. 2006 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 255-275.

Bibtex

@article{83640688a8ac43c5a5c797795494716c,
title = "Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetics, Darmstadt 1970-1972.",
abstract = "In the historiography of the Darmstadt Ferienkurse, the 1970s, when they are examined at all, are generally regarded as a period of stagnation, between the fervour of serial activity in the 1950s and the resurgence of the courses in the 1980s under the banner of various inflections of New Complexity. Yet, in a period of political upheaval after 1968, dissent was felt at Darmstadt too, and protests in 1970 and 1972 saw the institution at its most politically volatile. These protest movements caused the courses{\textquoteright} director, Ernst Thomas, to institute wide-scale changes in their structure and content. Key roles in these protests were taken by journalists: indeed, clear parallels can be drawn between the seemingly egalitarian calls from journalists for Mitbestimmung (co-determination) at Darmstadt and the similar demands being made by their trade unions in the West German federation. Thomas{\textquoteright}s failure to deal with journalistic pressure and his heavy-handed treatment of individual protesters (notably Reinhard Oehlschl{\"a}gel) meant that, shrewd and durable though his reinvention of the courses was, it would be only in 1982, with the accession of a new director, that the press would begin to speak positively about the Darmstadt courses once more. A close reading of these two protests shows the sometime {\textquoteleft}citadel of the avant-garde{\textquoteright} at a distinctly precarious moment in its history. At the time, some felt that such protests could lead to the demise of the courses, and it was far from clear whether Thomas{\textquoteright}s reforms would be successful. But, even within this period of uncertainty, the Darmstadt Ferienkurse were anything but stagnant.",
author = "Martin Iddon",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=TCM The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, twentieth-century music, 3 (2), pp 255-275 2006, {\textcopyright} 2006 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2006",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1017/S1478572207000485",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "255--275",
journal = "Twentieth-Century Music",
issn = "1478-5730",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trying to Speak: Between Politics and Aesthetics, Darmstadt 1970-1972.

AU - Iddon, Martin

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=TCM The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, twentieth-century music, 3 (2), pp 255-275 2006, © 2006 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - In the historiography of the Darmstadt Ferienkurse, the 1970s, when they are examined at all, are generally regarded as a period of stagnation, between the fervour of serial activity in the 1950s and the resurgence of the courses in the 1980s under the banner of various inflections of New Complexity. Yet, in a period of political upheaval after 1968, dissent was felt at Darmstadt too, and protests in 1970 and 1972 saw the institution at its most politically volatile. These protest movements caused the courses’ director, Ernst Thomas, to institute wide-scale changes in their structure and content. Key roles in these protests were taken by journalists: indeed, clear parallels can be drawn between the seemingly egalitarian calls from journalists for Mitbestimmung (co-determination) at Darmstadt and the similar demands being made by their trade unions in the West German federation. Thomas’s failure to deal with journalistic pressure and his heavy-handed treatment of individual protesters (notably Reinhard Oehlschlägel) meant that, shrewd and durable though his reinvention of the courses was, it would be only in 1982, with the accession of a new director, that the press would begin to speak positively about the Darmstadt courses once more. A close reading of these two protests shows the sometime ‘citadel of the avant-garde’ at a distinctly precarious moment in its history. At the time, some felt that such protests could lead to the demise of the courses, and it was far from clear whether Thomas’s reforms would be successful. But, even within this period of uncertainty, the Darmstadt Ferienkurse were anything but stagnant.

AB - In the historiography of the Darmstadt Ferienkurse, the 1970s, when they are examined at all, are generally regarded as a period of stagnation, between the fervour of serial activity in the 1950s and the resurgence of the courses in the 1980s under the banner of various inflections of New Complexity. Yet, in a period of political upheaval after 1968, dissent was felt at Darmstadt too, and protests in 1970 and 1972 saw the institution at its most politically volatile. These protest movements caused the courses’ director, Ernst Thomas, to institute wide-scale changes in their structure and content. Key roles in these protests were taken by journalists: indeed, clear parallels can be drawn between the seemingly egalitarian calls from journalists for Mitbestimmung (co-determination) at Darmstadt and the similar demands being made by their trade unions in the West German federation. Thomas’s failure to deal with journalistic pressure and his heavy-handed treatment of individual protesters (notably Reinhard Oehlschlägel) meant that, shrewd and durable though his reinvention of the courses was, it would be only in 1982, with the accession of a new director, that the press would begin to speak positively about the Darmstadt courses once more. A close reading of these two protests shows the sometime ‘citadel of the avant-garde’ at a distinctly precarious moment in its history. At the time, some felt that such protests could lead to the demise of the courses, and it was far from clear whether Thomas’s reforms would be successful. But, even within this period of uncertainty, the Darmstadt Ferienkurse were anything but stagnant.

U2 - 10.1017/S1478572207000485

DO - 10.1017/S1478572207000485

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 255

EP - 275

JO - Twentieth-Century Music

JF - Twentieth-Century Music

SN - 1478-5730

IS - 2

ER -