Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Turning the Tables

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Turning the Tables: Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Turning the Tables: Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria. / Wodak, Ruth.
In: Discourse & Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, 30.01.1991, p. 65-83.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wodak R. Turning the Tables: Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria. Discourse & Society. 1991 Jan 30;2(1):65-83. doi: 10.1177/0957926591002001004

Author

Wodak, Ruth. / Turning the Tables : Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria. In: Discourse & Society. 1991 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 65-83.

Bibtex

@article{f87bb10c2b974062b63d467735b1bdb9,
title = "Turning the Tables: Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria",
abstract = "This paper examines the mechanisms for the constitution and transport of anti-Jewish prejudice in public and private discourse in contemporary Austria. Of particular relevance for the analysis is the influence which contextual factors (such as setting, speaker(s), presence or absence of Jews, role of the moderator in televised discussions, prominence of the speakers, emotionality, discussion topics, etc.) may or may not have had. For this analysis it was thus necessary to develop and apply a new methodology and new categories, which incorporated a discursive-historical approach, inter-disciplinary theory formation and the connexus of textlinguistic, psychological and historical conceptions. The results of the analysis show that expressions of antisemitic prejudice as such abounded, but that the explicitness and directness of the prejudices expressed varied markedly according to context. During televised discussions, for example, the various forms of antisemitism were embedded in strategies of positive self-promotion and/or cultivation of one's image. In a series of spontaneous, semi-public discussions (which retained what might be called a conditional anonymity), however, whatever hindrances or inhibitions which seem to have been present in the televised discussions all but vanished. An example from a news programme on the 25 March 1986 will illustrate the major claims and methodology.",
keywords = "allusion, antisemitic discourse, antisemitic stereotypes, discourse of justification, hierarchy, Jewish conspiracy, predication, quotation, Waldheim affair, World Jewish Congress",
author = "Ruth Wodak",
year = "1991",
month = jan,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/0957926591002001004",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "65--83",
journal = "Discourse & Society",
issn = "0957-9265",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turning the Tables

T2 - Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria

AU - Wodak, Ruth

PY - 1991/1/30

Y1 - 1991/1/30

N2 - This paper examines the mechanisms for the constitution and transport of anti-Jewish prejudice in public and private discourse in contemporary Austria. Of particular relevance for the analysis is the influence which contextual factors (such as setting, speaker(s), presence or absence of Jews, role of the moderator in televised discussions, prominence of the speakers, emotionality, discussion topics, etc.) may or may not have had. For this analysis it was thus necessary to develop and apply a new methodology and new categories, which incorporated a discursive-historical approach, inter-disciplinary theory formation and the connexus of textlinguistic, psychological and historical conceptions. The results of the analysis show that expressions of antisemitic prejudice as such abounded, but that the explicitness and directness of the prejudices expressed varied markedly according to context. During televised discussions, for example, the various forms of antisemitism were embedded in strategies of positive self-promotion and/or cultivation of one's image. In a series of spontaneous, semi-public discussions (which retained what might be called a conditional anonymity), however, whatever hindrances or inhibitions which seem to have been present in the televised discussions all but vanished. An example from a news programme on the 25 March 1986 will illustrate the major claims and methodology.

AB - This paper examines the mechanisms for the constitution and transport of anti-Jewish prejudice in public and private discourse in contemporary Austria. Of particular relevance for the analysis is the influence which contextual factors (such as setting, speaker(s), presence or absence of Jews, role of the moderator in televised discussions, prominence of the speakers, emotionality, discussion topics, etc.) may or may not have had. For this analysis it was thus necessary to develop and apply a new methodology and new categories, which incorporated a discursive-historical approach, inter-disciplinary theory formation and the connexus of textlinguistic, psychological and historical conceptions. The results of the analysis show that expressions of antisemitic prejudice as such abounded, but that the explicitness and directness of the prejudices expressed varied markedly according to context. During televised discussions, for example, the various forms of antisemitism were embedded in strategies of positive self-promotion and/or cultivation of one's image. In a series of spontaneous, semi-public discussions (which retained what might be called a conditional anonymity), however, whatever hindrances or inhibitions which seem to have been present in the televised discussions all but vanished. An example from a news programme on the 25 March 1986 will illustrate the major claims and methodology.

KW - allusion

KW - antisemitic discourse

KW - antisemitic stereotypes

KW - discourse of justification

KW - hierarchy

KW - Jewish conspiracy

KW - predication

KW - quotation

KW - Waldheim affair

KW - World Jewish Congress

U2 - 10.1177/0957926591002001004

DO - 10.1177/0957926591002001004

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84928832985

VL - 2

SP - 65

EP - 83

JO - Discourse & Society

JF - Discourse & Society

SN - 0957-9265

IS - 1

ER -