Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Two essays on earnings comparability

Electronic data

  • 2018liuphd

    Final published version, 1.81 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Two essays on earnings comparability

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Two essays on earnings comparability. / Liu, Jiancheng.
Lancaster University, 2018. 185 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Liu, J. (2018). Two essays on earnings comparability. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/292

Vancouver

Liu J. Two essays on earnings comparability. Lancaster University, 2018. 185 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/292

Author

Liu, Jiancheng. / Two essays on earnings comparability. Lancaster University, 2018. 185 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{44754c6f543044e39159c9d56766be0c,
title = "Two essays on earnings comparability",
abstract = "Prior studies have established an extensive literature on accounting comparability, largely with the focus on its economic consequences. However, the current literature is characterised by at least two limitations. First, the prior studies on earnings comparability document evidence exclusively for GAAP earnings despite the fact that non-GAAP earnings are widely used by market participants. Second, while research has examined the economic consequences of comparability, limited attention has been given to the underlying mechanism that produces more comparable (or incomparable) earnings. My thesis, composed of two related studies, aims to contribute to these two gaps. Chapter 4 seeks to fill the first gap by bridging the literatures on accounting comparability and non-GAAP earnings. Specifically, I find that non-GAAP adjustments are associated with significant comparability benefits. Chapter 5 aims to close the second gap regarding the underlying mechanism that produces comparable (or incomparable) earnings. The main finding suggests that earnings comparability is partially driven by firms{\textquoteright} accrual components. These findings combined contribute to the literature by furthering our understanding of the underlying determining factors for earnings comparability.",
author = "Jiancheng Liu",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/292",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Two essays on earnings comparability

AU - Liu, Jiancheng

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Prior studies have established an extensive literature on accounting comparability, largely with the focus on its economic consequences. However, the current literature is characterised by at least two limitations. First, the prior studies on earnings comparability document evidence exclusively for GAAP earnings despite the fact that non-GAAP earnings are widely used by market participants. Second, while research has examined the economic consequences of comparability, limited attention has been given to the underlying mechanism that produces more comparable (or incomparable) earnings. My thesis, composed of two related studies, aims to contribute to these two gaps. Chapter 4 seeks to fill the first gap by bridging the literatures on accounting comparability and non-GAAP earnings. Specifically, I find that non-GAAP adjustments are associated with significant comparability benefits. Chapter 5 aims to close the second gap regarding the underlying mechanism that produces comparable (or incomparable) earnings. The main finding suggests that earnings comparability is partially driven by firms’ accrual components. These findings combined contribute to the literature by furthering our understanding of the underlying determining factors for earnings comparability.

AB - Prior studies have established an extensive literature on accounting comparability, largely with the focus on its economic consequences. However, the current literature is characterised by at least two limitations. First, the prior studies on earnings comparability document evidence exclusively for GAAP earnings despite the fact that non-GAAP earnings are widely used by market participants. Second, while research has examined the economic consequences of comparability, limited attention has been given to the underlying mechanism that produces more comparable (or incomparable) earnings. My thesis, composed of two related studies, aims to contribute to these two gaps. Chapter 4 seeks to fill the first gap by bridging the literatures on accounting comparability and non-GAAP earnings. Specifically, I find that non-GAAP adjustments are associated with significant comparability benefits. Chapter 5 aims to close the second gap regarding the underlying mechanism that produces comparable (or incomparable) earnings. The main finding suggests that earnings comparability is partially driven by firms’ accrual components. These findings combined contribute to the literature by furthering our understanding of the underlying determining factors for earnings comparability.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/292

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/292

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -