Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.

Research output: ThesisMaster's Thesis

Published

Standard

UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics. / Evans, Megan.
Lancaster University, 2024. 162 p.

Research output: ThesisMaster's Thesis

Harvard

Evans, M 2024, 'UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.', Masters by Research, Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2644

APA

Evans, M. (2024). UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics. [Master's Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2644

Vancouver

Evans M. UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.. Lancaster University, 2024. 162 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2644

Author

Evans, Megan. / UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.. Lancaster University, 2024. 162 p.

Bibtex

@mastersthesis{0bf8ff40bae44db7a5d22a8559abfc02,
title = "UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.",
abstract = "Agrivoltaics (A.V) is thought to help work towards the global sustainable transition, as we endeavour to produce more {\textquoteleft}green{\textquoteright} electricity. A.V combines farming, {\textquoteleft}agri{\textquoteright}, and solar photovoltaics, {\textquoteleft}voltaics{\textquoteright}, in attempt to provide a land-use and resource efficient solution to meet both food demands and climate incentives. There has been many studies looking at the efficacy of A.V on farmland and how it benefits farmers through increased crop growth and income diversification. Yet, there hasn{\textquoteright}t been much consideration in literature to the fact that it may not be an upscaled solution in the UK, due to different place-based contexts such as climatic conditions and land quality grading. As a result, farmers are rightfully pragmatic, questioning its place in their farming business model. So, my research focuses on the agency of farmers, as a way to empower their decision-making in deciding to adopt new technologies. The research method comprises of interviewing UK farmers and land developers with various levels of A.V knowledge, as they are at the centre of decision-making in employing A.V on their land. The interviews allow for a discussion in terms of how they come to understand A. V{\textquoteright}s role in the UK, and their personal values, which are important to consider as they inform their decisions in accepting or rejecting A.V on an individual level. The major findings in this study show that we should not assume universal acceptance of such technologies. The rejection of such technology should not lead to farmer{\textquoteright}s being perceived as traditional, rather, we should endeavour to focus on how technologies come to be understood and accepted, and empower the farmer{\textquoteright}s decision making, rather than focusing on how A.V acts in a defined set of circumstances or contexts, as A.V literature often has referred to.",
keywords = "Understanding - How technology and social organization are related, and how a given technology can be conceptualised and reimagined (Spijkerboer et al., 2022). Identity - Identity shapes how technology is socially constructed and reimagined (Ulucanlar et al., 2013). Acceptance - How likely a person or group is to accept a given technology (Taherdoost, 2018). Political Ecologies – Social power relations and interactions with the land can shape each other, and outcomes of sustainable technology adoption (Roberts, 2020). Instrumentalist – Views technology as inherently neutral and a solution to human{\textquoteright}s social and economic needs and desires (Fernandez, 2021). Constructivist – Brings agency to the person choosing the technology and sketches the social construction of technology (Pinch and Bijker, 1984).",
author = "Megan Evans",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
day = "11",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2644",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - THES

T1 - UK farmers perceptions of Agrivoltaics.

AU - Evans, Megan

PY - 2024/12/11

Y1 - 2024/12/11

N2 - Agrivoltaics (A.V) is thought to help work towards the global sustainable transition, as we endeavour to produce more ‘green’ electricity. A.V combines farming, ‘agri’, and solar photovoltaics, ‘voltaics’, in attempt to provide a land-use and resource efficient solution to meet both food demands and climate incentives. There has been many studies looking at the efficacy of A.V on farmland and how it benefits farmers through increased crop growth and income diversification. Yet, there hasn’t been much consideration in literature to the fact that it may not be an upscaled solution in the UK, due to different place-based contexts such as climatic conditions and land quality grading. As a result, farmers are rightfully pragmatic, questioning its place in their farming business model. So, my research focuses on the agency of farmers, as a way to empower their decision-making in deciding to adopt new technologies. The research method comprises of interviewing UK farmers and land developers with various levels of A.V knowledge, as they are at the centre of decision-making in employing A.V on their land. The interviews allow for a discussion in terms of how they come to understand A. V’s role in the UK, and their personal values, which are important to consider as they inform their decisions in accepting or rejecting A.V on an individual level. The major findings in this study show that we should not assume universal acceptance of such technologies. The rejection of such technology should not lead to farmer’s being perceived as traditional, rather, we should endeavour to focus on how technologies come to be understood and accepted, and empower the farmer’s decision making, rather than focusing on how A.V acts in a defined set of circumstances or contexts, as A.V literature often has referred to.

AB - Agrivoltaics (A.V) is thought to help work towards the global sustainable transition, as we endeavour to produce more ‘green’ electricity. A.V combines farming, ‘agri’, and solar photovoltaics, ‘voltaics’, in attempt to provide a land-use and resource efficient solution to meet both food demands and climate incentives. There has been many studies looking at the efficacy of A.V on farmland and how it benefits farmers through increased crop growth and income diversification. Yet, there hasn’t been much consideration in literature to the fact that it may not be an upscaled solution in the UK, due to different place-based contexts such as climatic conditions and land quality grading. As a result, farmers are rightfully pragmatic, questioning its place in their farming business model. So, my research focuses on the agency of farmers, as a way to empower their decision-making in deciding to adopt new technologies. The research method comprises of interviewing UK farmers and land developers with various levels of A.V knowledge, as they are at the centre of decision-making in employing A.V on their land. The interviews allow for a discussion in terms of how they come to understand A. V’s role in the UK, and their personal values, which are important to consider as they inform their decisions in accepting or rejecting A.V on an individual level. The major findings in this study show that we should not assume universal acceptance of such technologies. The rejection of such technology should not lead to farmer’s being perceived as traditional, rather, we should endeavour to focus on how technologies come to be understood and accepted, and empower the farmer’s decision making, rather than focusing on how A.V acts in a defined set of circumstances or contexts, as A.V literature often has referred to.

KW - Understanding - How technology and social organization are related, and how a given technology can be conceptualised and reimagined (Spijkerboer et al., 2022). Identity - Identity shapes how technology is socially constructed and reimagined (Ulucanlar et

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2644

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2644

M3 - Master's Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -