Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - ...
View graph of relations

Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it? / Paton, R. W.; Srinivasan, M. S.; Shah, B. et al.
In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, Vol. 81-B, No. 2, 03.1999, p. 255-258.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Paton, RW, Srinivasan, MS, Shah, B & Hollis, S 1999, 'Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it?', Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, vol. 81-B, no. 2, pp. 255-258. <http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/abstract/81-B/2/255>

APA

Paton, R. W., Srinivasan, M. S., Shah, B., & Hollis, S. (1999). Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, 81-B(2), 255-258. http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/abstract/81-B/2/255

Vancouver

Paton RW, Srinivasan MS, Shah B, Hollis S. Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume. 1999 Mar;81-B(2):255-258.

Author

Paton, R. W. ; Srinivasan, M. S. ; Shah, B. et al. / Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it?. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume. 1999 ; Vol. 81-B, No. 2. pp. 255-258.

Bibtex

@article{40a6e072329a43d5b73cb913c8c71219,
title = "Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it?",
abstract = "Between May 1992 and April 1997, there were 20 452 births in the Blackburn District. In the same period 1107 infants with hip {\textquoteleft}at-risk{\textquoteright} factors were screened prospectively by ultrasound. We recorded the presence of dislocation and dysplasia detected under the age of six months using Graf{\textquoteright}s alpha angle. Early dislocation was present in 36 hips (34 dislocatable and 2 irreducible). Of the 36 unstable hips, 30 (83%) were referred as being Ortolani-positive or unstable; 25 (69%) of these had at least one of the risk factors. Only 11 (31%) were identified from the {\textquoteleft}at-risk{\textquoteright} screening programme alone (0.54 per 1000 live births). Eight cases of {\textquoteleft}late{\textquoteright} dislocation presented after the age of six months (0.39 per 1000 live births). The overall rate of dislocation was 2.2 per 1000 live births. Only 31% of the dislocated hips belonged to a major {\textquoteleft}at-risk{\textquoteright} group. Statistical analysis confirmed that the risk factors had a relatively poor predictive value if used as a screening test for dislocation. In infants referred for doubtful clinical instability, one dislocation was detected for every 11 infants screened (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 17) whereas in infants referred because of the presence of any of the major {\textquoteleft}at-risk{\textquoteright} factors the rate was one in 75 (95% CI 42 to 149). Routine ultrasound screening of the {\textquoteleft}at-risk{\textquoteright} groups on their own is of little value in significantly reducing the rate of {\textquoteleft}late{\textquoteright} dislocation in DDH, but screening clinically unstable hips alone or associated with {\textquoteleft}at-risk{\textquoteright} factors has a high rate of detection.",
author = "Paton, {R. W.} and Srinivasan, {M. S.} and B. Shah and Sally Hollis",
year = "1999",
month = mar,
language = "English",
volume = "81-B",
pages = "255--258",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume",
issn = "0301-620X",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound screening for at risk hips in DDH - is it worth it?

AU - Paton, R. W.

AU - Srinivasan, M. S.

AU - Shah, B.

AU - Hollis, Sally

PY - 1999/3

Y1 - 1999/3

N2 - Between May 1992 and April 1997, there were 20 452 births in the Blackburn District. In the same period 1107 infants with hip ‘at-risk’ factors were screened prospectively by ultrasound. We recorded the presence of dislocation and dysplasia detected under the age of six months using Graf’s alpha angle. Early dislocation was present in 36 hips (34 dislocatable and 2 irreducible). Of the 36 unstable hips, 30 (83%) were referred as being Ortolani-positive or unstable; 25 (69%) of these had at least one of the risk factors. Only 11 (31%) were identified from the ‘at-risk’ screening programme alone (0.54 per 1000 live births). Eight cases of ‘late’ dislocation presented after the age of six months (0.39 per 1000 live births). The overall rate of dislocation was 2.2 per 1000 live births. Only 31% of the dislocated hips belonged to a major ‘at-risk’ group. Statistical analysis confirmed that the risk factors had a relatively poor predictive value if used as a screening test for dislocation. In infants referred for doubtful clinical instability, one dislocation was detected for every 11 infants screened (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 17) whereas in infants referred because of the presence of any of the major ‘at-risk’ factors the rate was one in 75 (95% CI 42 to 149). Routine ultrasound screening of the ‘at-risk’ groups on their own is of little value in significantly reducing the rate of ‘late’ dislocation in DDH, but screening clinically unstable hips alone or associated with ‘at-risk’ factors has a high rate of detection.

AB - Between May 1992 and April 1997, there were 20 452 births in the Blackburn District. In the same period 1107 infants with hip ‘at-risk’ factors were screened prospectively by ultrasound. We recorded the presence of dislocation and dysplasia detected under the age of six months using Graf’s alpha angle. Early dislocation was present in 36 hips (34 dislocatable and 2 irreducible). Of the 36 unstable hips, 30 (83%) were referred as being Ortolani-positive or unstable; 25 (69%) of these had at least one of the risk factors. Only 11 (31%) were identified from the ‘at-risk’ screening programme alone (0.54 per 1000 live births). Eight cases of ‘late’ dislocation presented after the age of six months (0.39 per 1000 live births). The overall rate of dislocation was 2.2 per 1000 live births. Only 31% of the dislocated hips belonged to a major ‘at-risk’ group. Statistical analysis confirmed that the risk factors had a relatively poor predictive value if used as a screening test for dislocation. In infants referred for doubtful clinical instability, one dislocation was detected for every 11 infants screened (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 17) whereas in infants referred because of the presence of any of the major ‘at-risk’ factors the rate was one in 75 (95% CI 42 to 149). Routine ultrasound screening of the ‘at-risk’ groups on their own is of little value in significantly reducing the rate of ‘late’ dislocation in DDH, but screening clinically unstable hips alone or associated with ‘at-risk’ factors has a high rate of detection.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 81-B

SP - 255

EP - 258

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume

SN - 0301-620X

IS - 2

ER -