Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘Uncontested’ view of Shi’i networks
View graph of relations

‘Uncontested’ view of Shi’i networks: A reply to Corboz

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘Uncontested’ view of Shi’i networks : A reply to Corboz. / Nasirzadeh, S.

In: Global Discourse, Vol. 9, No. 4, 30.11.2019, p. 741-744.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Nasirzadeh, S. / ‘Uncontested’ view of Shi’i networks : A reply to Corboz. In: Global Discourse. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 741-744.

Bibtex

@article{b7c0eb9caa9a4c76b579571be3390065,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Uncontested{\textquoteright} view of Shi{\textquoteright}i networks: A reply to Corboz",
abstract = "  The starting point for Corboz{\textquoteright}s article {\textquoteleft}Shi{\textquoteright}i Clerical Networks and the Transnational Contest over Sacred Authority by challenging assumptions that velayat-e faqih is an {\textquoteleft}uncontested{\textquoteright} position: Dynamics in London{\textquoteright}s Shi{\textquoteright}i Triangle{\textquoteright} is a proposal that gives emphasis to a transnational contest between maraji{\textquoteright} and the Iranian Supreme Leader over sacred authority. Corboz{\textquoteright}s core argument seeks to undermine the view of the velayat-e faqih being the only relevant {\textquoteleft}model{\textquoteright} of clerical authority in today and future Shi{\textquoteright}i worlds by exploring Shi{\textquoteright}a networks in London. In response, I argue that the political and religious authority of velayat-e faqih cannot be contested with the religious functionality of marja{\textquoteright}iyya in Shi{\textquoteright}ism. Second, the notion of a {\textquoteleft}Shi{\textquoteright}a Crescent{\textquoteright} as well as the accusation that Iran is orchestratings the Shi{\textquoteright}a groups – via which the authoritarian regimes ensured their survival during the Arab Springs – should be rejected by accepting that even the most pro-Iranian groups do not necessarily tend to repeat the Iranian model of leadership. Finally, I emphasise that challenging the power to rule as a feature of velayat-e faqih by holding Iran{\textquoteright}s Supreme Leader in the Islamic Republic of Iran with marja{\textquoteright}iyya does not provide an adequate understanding of the multidimensional dynamics of Shi{\textquoteright}ism.",
keywords = "Shi{\textquoteright}a networks, velayat-e faqih, Marja{\textquoteright}iyya, Ayatollah Khamenei, Ayatollah Sistani",
author = "S. Nasirzadeh",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1332/204378919X15718900395757",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "741--744",
journal = "Global Discourse",
issn = "2326-9995",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Uncontested’ view of Shi’i networks

T2 - A reply to Corboz

AU - Nasirzadeh, S.

PY - 2019/11/30

Y1 - 2019/11/30

N2 -  The starting point for Corboz’s article ‘Shi’i Clerical Networks and the Transnational Contest over Sacred Authority by challenging assumptions that velayat-e faqih is an ‘uncontested’ position: Dynamics in London’s Shi’i Triangle’ is a proposal that gives emphasis to a transnational contest between maraji’ and the Iranian Supreme Leader over sacred authority. Corboz’s core argument seeks to undermine the view of the velayat-e faqih being the only relevant ‘model’ of clerical authority in today and future Shi’i worlds by exploring Shi’a networks in London. In response, I argue that the political and religious authority of velayat-e faqih cannot be contested with the religious functionality of marja’iyya in Shi’ism. Second, the notion of a ‘Shi’a Crescent’ as well as the accusation that Iran is orchestratings the Shi’a groups – via which the authoritarian regimes ensured their survival during the Arab Springs – should be rejected by accepting that even the most pro-Iranian groups do not necessarily tend to repeat the Iranian model of leadership. Finally, I emphasise that challenging the power to rule as a feature of velayat-e faqih by holding Iran’s Supreme Leader in the Islamic Republic of Iran with marja’iyya does not provide an adequate understanding of the multidimensional dynamics of Shi’ism.

AB -  The starting point for Corboz’s article ‘Shi’i Clerical Networks and the Transnational Contest over Sacred Authority by challenging assumptions that velayat-e faqih is an ‘uncontested’ position: Dynamics in London’s Shi’i Triangle’ is a proposal that gives emphasis to a transnational contest between maraji’ and the Iranian Supreme Leader over sacred authority. Corboz’s core argument seeks to undermine the view of the velayat-e faqih being the only relevant ‘model’ of clerical authority in today and future Shi’i worlds by exploring Shi’a networks in London. In response, I argue that the political and religious authority of velayat-e faqih cannot be contested with the religious functionality of marja’iyya in Shi’ism. Second, the notion of a ‘Shi’a Crescent’ as well as the accusation that Iran is orchestratings the Shi’a groups – via which the authoritarian regimes ensured their survival during the Arab Springs – should be rejected by accepting that even the most pro-Iranian groups do not necessarily tend to repeat the Iranian model of leadership. Finally, I emphasise that challenging the power to rule as a feature of velayat-e faqih by holding Iran’s Supreme Leader in the Islamic Republic of Iran with marja’iyya does not provide an adequate understanding of the multidimensional dynamics of Shi’ism.

KW - Shi’a networks

KW - velayat-e faqih

KW - Marja’iyya

KW - Ayatollah Khamenei

KW - Ayatollah Sistani

U2 - 10.1332/204378919X15718900395757

DO - 10.1332/204378919X15718900395757

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 741

EP - 744

JO - Global Discourse

JF - Global Discourse

SN - 2326-9995

IS - 4

ER -