Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Understanding behavioural responses to human-in...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis. / Gunn, R.L.; Hartley, I.R.; Algar, A.C. et al.
In: Oikos, Vol. 2022, No. 4, e08366, 30.04.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gunn RL, Hartley IR, Algar AC, Niemelä PT, Keith SA. Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis. Oikos. 2022 Apr 30;2022(4):e08366. Epub 2021 Sept 15. doi: 10.1111/oik.08366

Author

Bibtex

@article{074a85aaa1654cb5ae1c0d1f335183a7,
title = "Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Behavioural responses are often the first reaction of an organism to human-induced rapid environmental change (HIREC), yet current empirical evidence provides no consensus about the main environmental features that animals respond to behaviourally or which behaviours are responsive to HIREC. To understand how changes in behaviour can be predicted by different forms of HIREC, we conducted a meta-analysis of the existing empirical literature focusing on behavioural responses to five axes of environmental change (climate change, changes in CO2, direct human impact, changes in nutrients and biotic exchanges) in five behavioural domains (aggression, exploration, activity, boldness and sociability) across a range of taxa but with a focus on fish and bird species. Our meta-analysis revealed a general absence of directional behavioural responses to HIREC. However, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes was large. This means that animals have strong behavioural responses to HIREC, but the responses are not clearly in any particular direction. Moreover, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes differed between different behaviours and different forms of HIREC: Exploration responded more strongly than activity, and climate change induced the strongest behavioural responses. Model heterogeneities identified that effect sizes varied primarily because of study design, and the specific sample of individuals used in a study; phylogeny also explains significant variation in our bird model. Based on these results, we make four recommendations to further our understanding: 1) a more balanced representation of laboratory and field studies, 2) consideration of context dependency, 3) standardisation of the methods and definitions used to quantify and study behaviours and 4) consideration of the role for individual differences in behaviour.  ",
keywords = "Bayesian, behaviour, climate change, field, laboratory",
author = "R.L. Gunn and I.R. Hartley and A.C. Algar and P.T. Niemel{\"a} and S.A. Keith",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/oik.08366",
language = "English",
volume = "2022",
journal = "Oikos",
issn = "0030-1299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change

T2 - a meta-analysis

AU - Gunn, R.L.

AU - Hartley, I.R.

AU - Algar, A.C.

AU - Niemelä, P.T.

AU - Keith, S.A.

PY - 2022/4/30

Y1 - 2022/4/30

N2 - Behavioural responses are often the first reaction of an organism to human-induced rapid environmental change (HIREC), yet current empirical evidence provides no consensus about the main environmental features that animals respond to behaviourally or which behaviours are responsive to HIREC. To understand how changes in behaviour can be predicted by different forms of HIREC, we conducted a meta-analysis of the existing empirical literature focusing on behavioural responses to five axes of environmental change (climate change, changes in CO2, direct human impact, changes in nutrients and biotic exchanges) in five behavioural domains (aggression, exploration, activity, boldness and sociability) across a range of taxa but with a focus on fish and bird species. Our meta-analysis revealed a general absence of directional behavioural responses to HIREC. However, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes was large. This means that animals have strong behavioural responses to HIREC, but the responses are not clearly in any particular direction. Moreover, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes differed between different behaviours and different forms of HIREC: Exploration responded more strongly than activity, and climate change induced the strongest behavioural responses. Model heterogeneities identified that effect sizes varied primarily because of study design, and the specific sample of individuals used in a study; phylogeny also explains significant variation in our bird model. Based on these results, we make four recommendations to further our understanding: 1) a more balanced representation of laboratory and field studies, 2) consideration of context dependency, 3) standardisation of the methods and definitions used to quantify and study behaviours and 4) consideration of the role for individual differences in behaviour.  

AB - Behavioural responses are often the first reaction of an organism to human-induced rapid environmental change (HIREC), yet current empirical evidence provides no consensus about the main environmental features that animals respond to behaviourally or which behaviours are responsive to HIREC. To understand how changes in behaviour can be predicted by different forms of HIREC, we conducted a meta-analysis of the existing empirical literature focusing on behavioural responses to five axes of environmental change (climate change, changes in CO2, direct human impact, changes in nutrients and biotic exchanges) in five behavioural domains (aggression, exploration, activity, boldness and sociability) across a range of taxa but with a focus on fish and bird species. Our meta-analysis revealed a general absence of directional behavioural responses to HIREC. However, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes was large. This means that animals have strong behavioural responses to HIREC, but the responses are not clearly in any particular direction. Moreover, the absolute magnitude of the effect sizes differed between different behaviours and different forms of HIREC: Exploration responded more strongly than activity, and climate change induced the strongest behavioural responses. Model heterogeneities identified that effect sizes varied primarily because of study design, and the specific sample of individuals used in a study; phylogeny also explains significant variation in our bird model. Based on these results, we make four recommendations to further our understanding: 1) a more balanced representation of laboratory and field studies, 2) consideration of context dependency, 3) standardisation of the methods and definitions used to quantify and study behaviours and 4) consideration of the role for individual differences in behaviour.  

KW - Bayesian

KW - behaviour

KW - climate change

KW - field

KW - laboratory

U2 - 10.1111/oik.08366

DO - 10.1111/oik.08366

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2022

JO - Oikos

JF - Oikos

SN - 0030-1299

IS - 4

M1 - e08366

ER -