Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Unpalatable truths

Electronic data

  • ignorance_food_animal_minds_ACCEPTED

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Appetite. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Appetite, 171, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

    Accepted author manuscript, 542 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds. / Leach, S.; Piazza, J.; Loughnan, S. et al.
In: Appetite, Vol. 171, 105935, 30.04.2022, p. 105935.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Leach, S, Piazza, J, Loughnan, S, Sutton, RM, Kapantai, I, Dhont, K & Douglas, KM 2022, 'Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds', Appetite, vol. 171, 105935, pp. 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

APA

Leach, S., Piazza, J., Loughnan, S., Sutton, R. M., Kapantai, I., Dhont, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds. Appetite, 171, 105935. Article 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

Vancouver

Leach S, Piazza J, Loughnan S, Sutton RM, Kapantai I, Dhont K et al. Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds. Appetite. 2022 Apr 30;171:105935. 105935. Epub 2022 Jan 20. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

Author

Bibtex

@article{b35fc0ce0de14d8d9dc40299a255e57e,
title = "Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds",
abstract = "Animal minds are of central importance to debates about their rights and welfare. Remaining ignorant of evidence that animals have minds is therefore likely to facilitate their mistreatment. Studying samples of adults and students from the UK and US we found that, consistent with motivational perspectives on meat consumption, those who were more (vs. less) committed to eating meat were more motivated to avoid exposure to information about food-animals{\textquoteright} sentience (Studies 1), showed less interest in exposure to articles about intelligent food animals (Studies 2a and 2b), and were quicker to terminate exposure to internet pop-ups containing information about food-animals{\textquoteright} minds (Studies 3a and 3b). At the same time, those who were more (vs. less) committed to eating meat approached information about companion-animals{\textquoteright} minds (Studies 2a-3b) and unintelligent food animals (Studies 2a and 2b) in largely the same ways. The findings demonstrate that, within the UK and US, the desire to eat meat is associated with strategies to avoid information that is likely to challenge meat consumption. ",
keywords = "Animals, Dissonance, Information avoidance, Meat, Mind attribution, adult, article, avoidance behavior, eating, human, human tissue, Internet, meat consumption, nonhuman, pet animal",
author = "S. Leach and J. Piazza and S. Loughnan and R.M. Sutton and I. Kapantai and K. Dhont and K.M. Douglas",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Appetite. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Appetite, 171, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "105935",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpalatable truths

T2 - Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds

AU - Leach, S.

AU - Piazza, J.

AU - Loughnan, S.

AU - Sutton, R.M.

AU - Kapantai, I.

AU - Dhont, K.

AU - Douglas, K.M.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Appetite. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Appetite, 171, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

PY - 2022/4/30

Y1 - 2022/4/30

N2 - Animal minds are of central importance to debates about their rights and welfare. Remaining ignorant of evidence that animals have minds is therefore likely to facilitate their mistreatment. Studying samples of adults and students from the UK and US we found that, consistent with motivational perspectives on meat consumption, those who were more (vs. less) committed to eating meat were more motivated to avoid exposure to information about food-animals’ sentience (Studies 1), showed less interest in exposure to articles about intelligent food animals (Studies 2a and 2b), and were quicker to terminate exposure to internet pop-ups containing information about food-animals’ minds (Studies 3a and 3b). At the same time, those who were more (vs. less) committed to eating meat approached information about companion-animals’ minds (Studies 2a-3b) and unintelligent food animals (Studies 2a and 2b) in largely the same ways. The findings demonstrate that, within the UK and US, the desire to eat meat is associated with strategies to avoid information that is likely to challenge meat consumption.

AB - Animal minds are of central importance to debates about their rights and welfare. Remaining ignorant of evidence that animals have minds is therefore likely to facilitate their mistreatment. Studying samples of adults and students from the UK and US we found that, consistent with motivational perspectives on meat consumption, those who were more (vs. less) committed to eating meat were more motivated to avoid exposure to information about food-animals’ sentience (Studies 1), showed less interest in exposure to articles about intelligent food animals (Studies 2a and 2b), and were quicker to terminate exposure to internet pop-ups containing information about food-animals’ minds (Studies 3a and 3b). At the same time, those who were more (vs. less) committed to eating meat approached information about companion-animals’ minds (Studies 2a-3b) and unintelligent food animals (Studies 2a and 2b) in largely the same ways. The findings demonstrate that, within the UK and US, the desire to eat meat is associated with strategies to avoid information that is likely to challenge meat consumption.

KW - Animals

KW - Dissonance

KW - Information avoidance

KW - Meat

KW - Mind attribution

KW - adult

KW - article

KW - avoidance behavior

KW - eating

KW - human

KW - human tissue

KW - Internet

KW - meat consumption

KW - nonhuman

KW - pet animal

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935

M3 - Journal article

VL - 171

SP - 105935

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

M1 - 105935

ER -