Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis

Electronic data

  • Main_Document_MS_Coping_

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 27, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016

    Accepted author manuscript, 713 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis: Association with demographic and disease-related characteristics

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis: Association with demographic and disease-related characteristics. / TONiC study group.
In: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Vol. 27, 01.2019, p. 214-222.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

TONiC study group. Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis: Association with demographic and disease-related characteristics. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2019 Jan;27:214-222. Epub 2018 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016

Author

TONiC study group. / Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis : Association with demographic and disease-related characteristics. In: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2019 ; Vol. 27. pp. 214-222.

Bibtex

@article{20df9a1d5a5f4852a73d612a54565327,
title = "Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis: Association with demographic and disease-related characteristics",
abstract = "Background: Coping positively and negatively influences psychosocial and other outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is conflicting evidence about the use of different coping strategies and their associations with demographic and disease characteristics. Our aims were to examine which coping strategies are used by a large sample of people with MS, then to identify any associations between demographic and disease related factors with use of individual coping strategies. Methods: Participants in the Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions (TONiC) study completed the Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE60) questionnaire. Relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and coping strategies were examined by multiple ordinal logistic regression to assess the effect of each potential predictor after adjustment for other possible covariates. Results: From 722 patients, the most commonly used strategy was Acceptance, followed by Active Coping, Planning and Positive Reinterpretation and Growth. All but two strategies showed significant associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. The most marked effects were found for Restraint, with people in employment 2.1 times as likely to utilise this strategy compared to those unemployed, and Seeking of Emotional Social Support and Focus on and Venting of Emotions, which were utilised twice as much by women compared to men. Behavioural and Mental Disengagement were highly associated with greater disability and not being in employment. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of several disease and demographic characteristics that are associated with use of potentially maladaptive coping strategies.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Psychological, COPE60, Coping Orientations to Problem Experienced 60-item questionnaire, Coping strategies, Cross-sectional studies, EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale, MS, Multiple sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of life, Rapidly-Evolving Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis, RERRMS, RRMS, Surveys and questionnaires, TONiC, Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions",
author = "{TONiC study group} and D.P. Holland and D.K. Schl{\"u}ter and C.A. Young and R.J. Mills and D.J. Rog and H.L. Ford and K. Orchard",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 27, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "214--222",
journal = "Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders",
issn = "2211-0348",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of coping strategies in multiple sclerosis

T2 - Association with demographic and disease-related characteristics

AU - TONiC study group

AU - Holland, D.P.

AU - Schlüter, D.K.

AU - Young, C.A.

AU - Mills, R.J.

AU - Rog, D.J.

AU - Ford, H.L.

AU - Orchard, K.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 27, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Background: Coping positively and negatively influences psychosocial and other outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is conflicting evidence about the use of different coping strategies and their associations with demographic and disease characteristics. Our aims were to examine which coping strategies are used by a large sample of people with MS, then to identify any associations between demographic and disease related factors with use of individual coping strategies. Methods: Participants in the Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions (TONiC) study completed the Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE60) questionnaire. Relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and coping strategies were examined by multiple ordinal logistic regression to assess the effect of each potential predictor after adjustment for other possible covariates. Results: From 722 patients, the most commonly used strategy was Acceptance, followed by Active Coping, Planning and Positive Reinterpretation and Growth. All but two strategies showed significant associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. The most marked effects were found for Restraint, with people in employment 2.1 times as likely to utilise this strategy compared to those unemployed, and Seeking of Emotional Social Support and Focus on and Venting of Emotions, which were utilised twice as much by women compared to men. Behavioural and Mental Disengagement were highly associated with greater disability and not being in employment. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of several disease and demographic characteristics that are associated with use of potentially maladaptive coping strategies.

AB - Background: Coping positively and negatively influences psychosocial and other outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is conflicting evidence about the use of different coping strategies and their associations with demographic and disease characteristics. Our aims were to examine which coping strategies are used by a large sample of people with MS, then to identify any associations between demographic and disease related factors with use of individual coping strategies. Methods: Participants in the Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions (TONiC) study completed the Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE60) questionnaire. Relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and coping strategies were examined by multiple ordinal logistic regression to assess the effect of each potential predictor after adjustment for other possible covariates. Results: From 722 patients, the most commonly used strategy was Acceptance, followed by Active Coping, Planning and Positive Reinterpretation and Growth. All but two strategies showed significant associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. The most marked effects were found for Restraint, with people in employment 2.1 times as likely to utilise this strategy compared to those unemployed, and Seeking of Emotional Social Support and Focus on and Venting of Emotions, which were utilised twice as much by women compared to men. Behavioural and Mental Disengagement were highly associated with greater disability and not being in employment. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of several disease and demographic characteristics that are associated with use of potentially maladaptive coping strategies.

KW - Adaptation, Psychological

KW - COPE60

KW - Coping Orientations to Problem Experienced 60-item questionnaire

KW - Coping strategies

KW - Cross-sectional studies

KW - EDSS

KW - Expanded Disability Status Scale

KW - MS

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Multiple Sclerosis

KW - Quality of life

KW - Rapidly-Evolving Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

KW - Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

KW - RERRMS

KW - RRMS

KW - Surveys and questionnaires

KW - TONiC

KW - Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions

U2 - 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016

DO - 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 214

EP - 222

JO - Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

JF - Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

SN - 2211-0348

ER -