Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Using concept mapping to understand motivationa...

Electronic data

  • Concept mapping Atkinson, Thomas, Parry

    Rights statement: This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Accepted author manuscript, 346 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice. / Parry, Sarah Louise; Atkinson, Cathy; Thomas, George.
In: Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, 09.04.2020, p. 165-174.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Parry, SL, Atkinson, C & Thomas, G 2020, 'Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice', Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-04-2019-0038

APA

Parry, S. L., Atkinson, C., & Thomas, G. (2020). Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-04-2019-0038

Vancouver

Parry SL, Atkinson C, Thomas G. Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice. Qualitative Research Journal. 2020 Apr 9;20(2):165-174. Epub 2020 Jan 10. doi: 10.1108/qrj-04-2019-0038

Author

Parry, Sarah Louise ; Atkinson, Cathy ; Thomas, George. / Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice. In: Qualitative Research Journal. 2020 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 165-174.

Bibtex

@article{e73f33a129ef472bace5871902b1da03,
title = "Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice",
abstract = "Motivational interviewing (MI) has developed considerably since its inception, which may have led to diverse practice across contexts and differential understanding of core principles. Concept mapping is one potential method for offering insight into practitioner awareness, understanding and application of MI. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approachIn total, 29 professionals from a range of disciplines, including counselling, education and health, completed concept maps about MI, following brief training at the UK regional MI interest network. In total, 17 completed maps were submitted for analysis using quantitative and qualitative methods.FindingsA total of 186 concepts and 175 propositional links were found within the 17 maps. The most commonly identified concepts were: change, empathy, collaboration, open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries (OARS), client centred and compassion. The concept maps also suggested differing levels of expertise across network members using concept mapping morphology classification.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample was small scale and located in one region of the UK. Maps were submitted anonymously meaning that participant data could not be matched to the maps.Practical implicationsConcept mapping is a potentially useful method for auditing practice and developing skills in MI, as well as exploring participants{\textquoteright} understanding of related concepts and therapeutic mechanisms.Social implicationsMI has a strong evidence-based across a variety of disciplines and contexts. Refining practitioner skills in MI has implications for the integrity of delivery, and improved client outcomes in areas such as substance use, health promotion and educational disaffection.Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate concept mapping as a means of understanding MI practice. It has potential implications for training, monitoring, supervision and development in MI practice.",
author = "Parry, {Sarah Louise} and Cathy Atkinson and George Thomas",
note = "This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1108/qrj-04-2019-0038",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "165--174",
journal = "Qualitative Research Journal",
issn = "1443-9883",
publisher = "RMIT Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using concept mapping to understand motivational interviewing practice

AU - Parry, Sarah Louise

AU - Atkinson, Cathy

AU - Thomas, George

N1 - This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

PY - 2020/4/9

Y1 - 2020/4/9

N2 - Motivational interviewing (MI) has developed considerably since its inception, which may have led to diverse practice across contexts and differential understanding of core principles. Concept mapping is one potential method for offering insight into practitioner awareness, understanding and application of MI. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approachIn total, 29 professionals from a range of disciplines, including counselling, education and health, completed concept maps about MI, following brief training at the UK regional MI interest network. In total, 17 completed maps were submitted for analysis using quantitative and qualitative methods.FindingsA total of 186 concepts and 175 propositional links were found within the 17 maps. The most commonly identified concepts were: change, empathy, collaboration, open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries (OARS), client centred and compassion. The concept maps also suggested differing levels of expertise across network members using concept mapping morphology classification.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample was small scale and located in one region of the UK. Maps were submitted anonymously meaning that participant data could not be matched to the maps.Practical implicationsConcept mapping is a potentially useful method for auditing practice and developing skills in MI, as well as exploring participants’ understanding of related concepts and therapeutic mechanisms.Social implicationsMI has a strong evidence-based across a variety of disciplines and contexts. Refining practitioner skills in MI has implications for the integrity of delivery, and improved client outcomes in areas such as substance use, health promotion and educational disaffection.Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate concept mapping as a means of understanding MI practice. It has potential implications for training, monitoring, supervision and development in MI practice.

AB - Motivational interviewing (MI) has developed considerably since its inception, which may have led to diverse practice across contexts and differential understanding of core principles. Concept mapping is one potential method for offering insight into practitioner awareness, understanding and application of MI. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approachIn total, 29 professionals from a range of disciplines, including counselling, education and health, completed concept maps about MI, following brief training at the UK regional MI interest network. In total, 17 completed maps were submitted for analysis using quantitative and qualitative methods.FindingsA total of 186 concepts and 175 propositional links were found within the 17 maps. The most commonly identified concepts were: change, empathy, collaboration, open-ended questions, affirmations, reflections, summaries (OARS), client centred and compassion. The concept maps also suggested differing levels of expertise across network members using concept mapping morphology classification.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample was small scale and located in one region of the UK. Maps were submitted anonymously meaning that participant data could not be matched to the maps.Practical implicationsConcept mapping is a potentially useful method for auditing practice and developing skills in MI, as well as exploring participants’ understanding of related concepts and therapeutic mechanisms.Social implicationsMI has a strong evidence-based across a variety of disciplines and contexts. Refining practitioner skills in MI has implications for the integrity of delivery, and improved client outcomes in areas such as substance use, health promotion and educational disaffection.Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate concept mapping as a means of understanding MI practice. It has potential implications for training, monitoring, supervision and development in MI practice.

U2 - 10.1108/qrj-04-2019-0038

DO - 10.1108/qrj-04-2019-0038

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 165

EP - 174

JO - Qualitative Research Journal

JF - Qualitative Research Journal

SN - 1443-9883

IS - 2

ER -