Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the r...

Electronic data

  • JEcol-2024-1172_Proof

    Accepted author manuscript, 206 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Published

Standard

Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline. / Buckley, Yvonne M.; Bardgett, Richard; Gordon, Rowena et al.
In: Journal of Ecology, Vol. 113, No. 2, 28.02.2025, p. 270-274.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Harvard

Buckley, YM, Bardgett, R, Gordon, R, Iler, A, Mariotte, P, Ponton, S & Hector, A 2025, 'Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline', Journal of Ecology, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 270-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14454

APA

Buckley, Y. M., Bardgett, R., Gordon, R., Iler, A., Mariotte, P., Ponton, S., & Hector, A. (2025). Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline. Journal of Ecology, 113(2), 270-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14454

Vancouver

Buckley YM, Bardgett R, Gordon R, Iler A, Mariotte P, Ponton S et al. Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline. Journal of Ecology. 2025 Feb 28;113(2):270-274. Epub 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14454

Author

Buckley, Yvonne M. ; Bardgett, Richard ; Gordon, Rowena et al. / Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline. In: Journal of Ecology. 2025 ; Vol. 113, No. 2. pp. 270-274.

Bibtex

@article{993f8cb1a6e340e79d1efad061c7d5f1,
title = "Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline",
abstract = "There is a research reproducibility crisis, including in ecology. The research pipeline from conception to publication has many cracks, which means that it may not be possible to repeat and verify published results.Reproducibility means that the results of a study can be reproduced from the original data. It is a critical step in the quality assurance of a study; indeed, the re-use and subsequent citation of methods from reproducible research can increase the impact of the work beyond the findings of the specific study.Given the original data, code and documentation, in theory, all research results could be reproduced. However, sufficient information must be available to understand and reproduce the data handling, analysis and modelling. Information should also be accessible, enabling reproduction with reasonable effort.Various open-source software options exist that allow scientists to easily annotate their scripts in a way that makes it simple to produce dynamic documents that give a more accessible account of the analysis (html, pdf and various word processor file types). Popular software options—including Jupyter notebooks, the R markdown package and the new multi-language Quarto application—produce documents that weave together the input code and software-generated output (text, tables, and figures) with the author's explanatory text to produce a clear narrative of the analysis process.Therefore, we now encourage the submission of supplementary dynamic documents to the Journal of Ecology to improve the reproducibility and transparency of research published in the journal. Reproducibility can be assessed prior to the submission of the work for publication, during peer review and post-publication. Authors are encouraged to provide three file types: the data, an executable dynamic document and a static reproducibility PDF file that integrates and annotates the input code with the statistical output. We provide some basic examples of dynamic documents for reproducibility.",
author = "Buckley, {Yvonne M.} and Richard Bardgett and Rowena Gordon and Amy Iler and Pierre Mariotte and Samantha Ponton and Andy Hector",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2745.14454",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "270--274",
journal = "Journal of Ecology",
issn = "0022-0477",
publisher = "Blackwell-Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using dynamic documents to mend cracks in the reproducible research pipeline

AU - Buckley, Yvonne M.

AU - Bardgett, Richard

AU - Gordon, Rowena

AU - Iler, Amy

AU - Mariotte, Pierre

AU - Ponton, Samantha

AU - Hector, Andy

PY - 2025/2/28

Y1 - 2025/2/28

N2 - There is a research reproducibility crisis, including in ecology. The research pipeline from conception to publication has many cracks, which means that it may not be possible to repeat and verify published results.Reproducibility means that the results of a study can be reproduced from the original data. It is a critical step in the quality assurance of a study; indeed, the re-use and subsequent citation of methods from reproducible research can increase the impact of the work beyond the findings of the specific study.Given the original data, code and documentation, in theory, all research results could be reproduced. However, sufficient information must be available to understand and reproduce the data handling, analysis and modelling. Information should also be accessible, enabling reproduction with reasonable effort.Various open-source software options exist that allow scientists to easily annotate their scripts in a way that makes it simple to produce dynamic documents that give a more accessible account of the analysis (html, pdf and various word processor file types). Popular software options—including Jupyter notebooks, the R markdown package and the new multi-language Quarto application—produce documents that weave together the input code and software-generated output (text, tables, and figures) with the author's explanatory text to produce a clear narrative of the analysis process.Therefore, we now encourage the submission of supplementary dynamic documents to the Journal of Ecology to improve the reproducibility and transparency of research published in the journal. Reproducibility can be assessed prior to the submission of the work for publication, during peer review and post-publication. Authors are encouraged to provide three file types: the data, an executable dynamic document and a static reproducibility PDF file that integrates and annotates the input code with the statistical output. We provide some basic examples of dynamic documents for reproducibility.

AB - There is a research reproducibility crisis, including in ecology. The research pipeline from conception to publication has many cracks, which means that it may not be possible to repeat and verify published results.Reproducibility means that the results of a study can be reproduced from the original data. It is a critical step in the quality assurance of a study; indeed, the re-use and subsequent citation of methods from reproducible research can increase the impact of the work beyond the findings of the specific study.Given the original data, code and documentation, in theory, all research results could be reproduced. However, sufficient information must be available to understand and reproduce the data handling, analysis and modelling. Information should also be accessible, enabling reproduction with reasonable effort.Various open-source software options exist that allow scientists to easily annotate their scripts in a way that makes it simple to produce dynamic documents that give a more accessible account of the analysis (html, pdf and various word processor file types). Popular software options—including Jupyter notebooks, the R markdown package and the new multi-language Quarto application—produce documents that weave together the input code and software-generated output (text, tables, and figures) with the author's explanatory text to produce a clear narrative of the analysis process.Therefore, we now encourage the submission of supplementary dynamic documents to the Journal of Ecology to improve the reproducibility and transparency of research published in the journal. Reproducibility can be assessed prior to the submission of the work for publication, during peer review and post-publication. Authors are encouraged to provide three file types: the data, an executable dynamic document and a static reproducibility PDF file that integrates and annotates the input code with the statistical output. We provide some basic examples of dynamic documents for reproducibility.

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2745.14454

DO - 10.1111/1365-2745.14454

M3 - Editorial

VL - 113

SP - 270

EP - 274

JO - Journal of Ecology

JF - Journal of Ecology

SN - 0022-0477

IS - 2

ER -