Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Using functional annotation for the empirical d...

Electronic data

  • journal.pone.0014808

    Rights statement: © 2011 Knight et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    Final published version, 231 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Using functional annotation for the empirical determination of Bayes Factors for genome-wide association study analysis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Using functional annotation for the empirical determination of Bayes Factors for genome-wide association study analysis. / Knight, Jo; Barnes, Michael R.; Breen, Gerome et al.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 6, No. 4, e14808, 27.04.2011.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Knight J, Barnes MR, Breen G, Weale ME. Using functional annotation for the empirical determination of Bayes Factors for genome-wide association study analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011 Apr 27;6(4):e14808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014808

Author

Bibtex

@article{83d1ec4a851045539c7abe0d8bc6969e,
title = "Using functional annotation for the empirical determination of Bayes Factors for genome-wide association study analysis",
abstract = "A genome wide association study (GWAS) typically results in a few highly significant 'hits' and a much larger set of suggestive signals ('near-hits'). The latter group are expected to be a mixture of true and false associations. One promising strategy to help separate these is to use functional annotations for prioritisation of variants for follow-up. A key task is to determine which annotations might prove most valuable. We address this question by examining the functional annotations of previously published GWAS hits. We explore three annotation categories: non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs), promoter SNPs and cis expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in open chromatin regions. We demonstrate that GWAS hit SNPs are enriched for these three functional categories, and that it would be appropriate to provide a higher weighting for such SNPs when performing Bayesian association analyses. For GWAS studies, our analyses suggest the use of a Bayes Factor of about 4 for cis eQTL SNPs within regions of open chromatin, 3 for nsSNPs and 2 for promoter SNPs.",
keywords = "Bayes Theorem, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci",
author = "Jo Knight and Barnes, {Michael R.} and Gerome Breen and Weale, {Michael E.}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2011 Knight et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",
year = "2011",
month = apr,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0014808",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using functional annotation for the empirical determination of Bayes Factors for genome-wide association study analysis

AU - Knight, Jo

AU - Barnes, Michael R.

AU - Breen, Gerome

AU - Weale, Michael E.

N1 - © 2011 Knight et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2011/4/27

Y1 - 2011/4/27

N2 - A genome wide association study (GWAS) typically results in a few highly significant 'hits' and a much larger set of suggestive signals ('near-hits'). The latter group are expected to be a mixture of true and false associations. One promising strategy to help separate these is to use functional annotations for prioritisation of variants for follow-up. A key task is to determine which annotations might prove most valuable. We address this question by examining the functional annotations of previously published GWAS hits. We explore three annotation categories: non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs), promoter SNPs and cis expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in open chromatin regions. We demonstrate that GWAS hit SNPs are enriched for these three functional categories, and that it would be appropriate to provide a higher weighting for such SNPs when performing Bayesian association analyses. For GWAS studies, our analyses suggest the use of a Bayes Factor of about 4 for cis eQTL SNPs within regions of open chromatin, 3 for nsSNPs and 2 for promoter SNPs.

AB - A genome wide association study (GWAS) typically results in a few highly significant 'hits' and a much larger set of suggestive signals ('near-hits'). The latter group are expected to be a mixture of true and false associations. One promising strategy to help separate these is to use functional annotations for prioritisation of variants for follow-up. A key task is to determine which annotations might prove most valuable. We address this question by examining the functional annotations of previously published GWAS hits. We explore three annotation categories: non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs), promoter SNPs and cis expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in open chromatin regions. We demonstrate that GWAS hit SNPs are enriched for these three functional categories, and that it would be appropriate to provide a higher weighting for such SNPs when performing Bayesian association analyses. For GWAS studies, our analyses suggest the use of a Bayes Factor of about 4 for cis eQTL SNPs within regions of open chromatin, 3 for nsSNPs and 2 for promoter SNPs.

KW - Bayes Theorem

KW - Genome-Wide Association Study

KW - Humans

KW - Linkage Disequilibrium

KW - Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

KW - Promoter Regions, Genetic

KW - Quantitative Trait Loci

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0014808

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0014808

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21556132

VL - 6

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e14808

ER -