Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Sili...
View graph of relations

Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments. / Stevens, Robert; Zhao, Jun; Goble, Carole.
In: Briefings in Bioinformatics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 183-194.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Stevens, R, Zhao, J & Goble, C 2007, 'Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments', Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbm015

APA

Stevens, R., Zhao, J., & Goble, C. (2007). Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 8(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbm015

Vancouver

Stevens R, Zhao J, Goble C. Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2007 May;8(3):183-194. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm015

Author

Stevens, Robert ; Zhao, Jun ; Goble, Carole. / Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments. In: Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2007 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 183-194.

Bibtex

@article{663edf2f8cc24ab6856d00d4cfb20f26,
title = "Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments",
abstract = "This article offers a briefing in one of the knowledge management issues of in silico experimentation in bioinformatics. Recording of the provenance of an experiment—what was done; where, how and why, etc. is an important aspect of scientific best practice that should be extended to in silico experimentation. We will do this in the context of eScience which has been part of the move of bioinformatics towards an industrial setting. Despite the computational nature of bioinformatics, these analyses are scientific and thus necessitate their own versions of typical scientific rigour. Just as recording who, what, why, when, where and how of an experiment is central to the scientific process in laboratory science, so it should be in silico science. The generation and recording of these aspects, or provenance, of an experiment are necessary knowledge management goals if we are to introduce scientific rigour into routine bioinformatics. In Silico experimental protocols should themselves be a form of managing the knowledge of how to perform bioinformatics analyses. Several systems now exist that offer support for the generation and collection of provenance information about how a particular in silico experiment was run, what results were generated, how they were generated, etc. In reviewing provenance support, we will review one of the important knowledge management issues in bioinformatics.",
keywords = "In Silico experiments, provenance , workflow , data derivation , validation and verification of results",
author = "Robert Stevens and Jun Zhao and Carole Goble",
year = "2007",
month = may,
doi = "10.1093/bib/bbm015",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "183--194",
journal = "Briefings in Bioinformatics",
issn = "1467-5463",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using provenance to manage knowledge of In Silico experiments

AU - Stevens, Robert

AU - Zhao, Jun

AU - Goble, Carole

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - This article offers a briefing in one of the knowledge management issues of in silico experimentation in bioinformatics. Recording of the provenance of an experiment—what was done; where, how and why, etc. is an important aspect of scientific best practice that should be extended to in silico experimentation. We will do this in the context of eScience which has been part of the move of bioinformatics towards an industrial setting. Despite the computational nature of bioinformatics, these analyses are scientific and thus necessitate their own versions of typical scientific rigour. Just as recording who, what, why, when, where and how of an experiment is central to the scientific process in laboratory science, so it should be in silico science. The generation and recording of these aspects, or provenance, of an experiment are necessary knowledge management goals if we are to introduce scientific rigour into routine bioinformatics. In Silico experimental protocols should themselves be a form of managing the knowledge of how to perform bioinformatics analyses. Several systems now exist that offer support for the generation and collection of provenance information about how a particular in silico experiment was run, what results were generated, how they were generated, etc. In reviewing provenance support, we will review one of the important knowledge management issues in bioinformatics.

AB - This article offers a briefing in one of the knowledge management issues of in silico experimentation in bioinformatics. Recording of the provenance of an experiment—what was done; where, how and why, etc. is an important aspect of scientific best practice that should be extended to in silico experimentation. We will do this in the context of eScience which has been part of the move of bioinformatics towards an industrial setting. Despite the computational nature of bioinformatics, these analyses are scientific and thus necessitate their own versions of typical scientific rigour. Just as recording who, what, why, when, where and how of an experiment is central to the scientific process in laboratory science, so it should be in silico science. The generation and recording of these aspects, or provenance, of an experiment are necessary knowledge management goals if we are to introduce scientific rigour into routine bioinformatics. In Silico experimental protocols should themselves be a form of managing the knowledge of how to perform bioinformatics analyses. Several systems now exist that offer support for the generation and collection of provenance information about how a particular in silico experiment was run, what results were generated, how they were generated, etc. In reviewing provenance support, we will review one of the important knowledge management issues in bioinformatics.

KW - In Silico experiments

KW - provenance

KW - workflow

KW - data derivation

KW - validation and verification of results

U2 - 10.1093/bib/bbm015

DO - 10.1093/bib/bbm015

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 183

EP - 194

JO - Briefings in Bioinformatics

JF - Briefings in Bioinformatics

SN - 1467-5463

IS - 3

ER -