Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Using shared experiences to recruit committed h...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection. / Neequaye, David A.; Granhag, Pär Anders.
In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.02.2024, p. 48-64.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Neequaye DA, Granhag PA. Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2024 Feb 1;29(1):48-64. Epub 2023 Nov 28. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12251

Author

Bibtex

@article{85c6f1512a614182aff290afc565c44b,
title = "Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection",
abstract = "AbstractObjectivesWe examined the possibility of using shared experiences to recruit human intelligence (HUMINT) sources. The research was based on two hypotheses. (a) Shared experiences amplify interpersonal affiliation, which increases the extent to which sources will commit to an intelligence arrangement. (b) The social connection opportunity shared experiences afford is what increases such commitment.MethodsParticipants assumed the role of a source meeting a potential handler, a police officer, to discuss an arrangement whereby they might supply intelligence. We manipulated shared experience via the meeting's setting. Half of the participants underwent a shared experience to facilitate interpersonal affiliation with the handler, and the other half did not undergo such an experience. The handler used one of two approaches to propose the arrangement. One approach afforded a social connection opportunity, and the other constrained the possibility of a social connection in the arrangement.ResultsThe findings indicated that shared experiences can have interpersonal influence. The shared experience operationalization positively influenced felt closeness and social connection affordance. However, there was little indication that handlers could capitalize on shared experience to bolster commitment.",
keywords = "shared attention, source recruitment, social connection, intelligence gathering",
author = "Neequaye, {David A.} and Granhag, {P{\"a}r Anders}",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lcrp.12251",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "48--64",
journal = "Legal and Criminological Psychology",
issn = "1355-3259",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources

T2 - Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection

AU - Neequaye, David A.

AU - Granhag, Pär Anders

PY - 2024/2/1

Y1 - 2024/2/1

N2 - AbstractObjectivesWe examined the possibility of using shared experiences to recruit human intelligence (HUMINT) sources. The research was based on two hypotheses. (a) Shared experiences amplify interpersonal affiliation, which increases the extent to which sources will commit to an intelligence arrangement. (b) The social connection opportunity shared experiences afford is what increases such commitment.MethodsParticipants assumed the role of a source meeting a potential handler, a police officer, to discuss an arrangement whereby they might supply intelligence. We manipulated shared experience via the meeting's setting. Half of the participants underwent a shared experience to facilitate interpersonal affiliation with the handler, and the other half did not undergo such an experience. The handler used one of two approaches to propose the arrangement. One approach afforded a social connection opportunity, and the other constrained the possibility of a social connection in the arrangement.ResultsThe findings indicated that shared experiences can have interpersonal influence. The shared experience operationalization positively influenced felt closeness and social connection affordance. However, there was little indication that handlers could capitalize on shared experience to bolster commitment.

AB - AbstractObjectivesWe examined the possibility of using shared experiences to recruit human intelligence (HUMINT) sources. The research was based on two hypotheses. (a) Shared experiences amplify interpersonal affiliation, which increases the extent to which sources will commit to an intelligence arrangement. (b) The social connection opportunity shared experiences afford is what increases such commitment.MethodsParticipants assumed the role of a source meeting a potential handler, a police officer, to discuss an arrangement whereby they might supply intelligence. We manipulated shared experience via the meeting's setting. Half of the participants underwent a shared experience to facilitate interpersonal affiliation with the handler, and the other half did not undergo such an experience. The handler used one of two approaches to propose the arrangement. One approach afforded a social connection opportunity, and the other constrained the possibility of a social connection in the arrangement.ResultsThe findings indicated that shared experiences can have interpersonal influence. The shared experience operationalization positively influenced felt closeness and social connection affordance. However, there was little indication that handlers could capitalize on shared experience to bolster commitment.

KW - shared attention

KW - source recruitment

KW - social connection

KW - intelligence gathering

U2 - 10.1111/lcrp.12251

DO - 10.1111/lcrp.12251

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 48

EP - 64

JO - Legal and Criminological Psychology

JF - Legal and Criminological Psychology

SN - 1355-3259

IS - 1

ER -