Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Validating the Male Rape Myth Scale - Shortened...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Validating the Male Rape Myth Scale - Shortened Version (MRMS-SV): Examining Melanson’s original factorial structure among a large nationally representative sample of the UK

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Validating the Male Rape Myth Scale - Shortened Version (MRMS-SV): Examining Melanson’s original factorial structure among a large nationally representative sample of the UK. / Weare, Siobhan; Willmott, Dominic.
In: The Journal of Men’s Studies, 25.04.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7b301b83b1244d6984a04f032559b6d3,
title = "Validating the Male Rape Myth Scale - Shortened Version (MRMS-SV): Examining Melanson{\textquoteright}s original factorial structure among a large nationally representative sample of the UK",
abstract = "Despite extensive use in research assessing myths around male sexual victimization, the factorial structure of Melanson{\textquoteright}s 1999 Male Rape Myth Scale [MRMS] was never psychometrically validated, meaning the relevance of scale items and dimensionality remained untested. Recruiting a nationally representative sample of 4152 UK adults, dimensionality and construct validity of the 22-item MRMS and a modified 19-item shortened version (MRMS-SV) were investigated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Analysis was conducted separately for the complete, male only (n = 2006), and female only (n = 2146) samples. Results indicate scores are best captured by a unidimensional solution across all samples tested, using the modified 19-item MRMS-SV version. Excellent internal reliability was observed among each sample. Research using the MRMS-SV can be confident in the scale{\textquoteright}s unidimensional validity.",
author = "Siobhan Weare and Dominic Willmott",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1177/10608265251338778",
language = "English",
journal = "The Journal of Men{\textquoteright}s Studies",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating the Male Rape Myth Scale - Shortened Version (MRMS-SV)

T2 - Examining Melanson’s original factorial structure among a large nationally representative sample of the UK

AU - Weare, Siobhan

AU - Willmott, Dominic

PY - 2025/4/25

Y1 - 2025/4/25

N2 - Despite extensive use in research assessing myths around male sexual victimization, the factorial structure of Melanson’s 1999 Male Rape Myth Scale [MRMS] was never psychometrically validated, meaning the relevance of scale items and dimensionality remained untested. Recruiting a nationally representative sample of 4152 UK adults, dimensionality and construct validity of the 22-item MRMS and a modified 19-item shortened version (MRMS-SV) were investigated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Analysis was conducted separately for the complete, male only (n = 2006), and female only (n = 2146) samples. Results indicate scores are best captured by a unidimensional solution across all samples tested, using the modified 19-item MRMS-SV version. Excellent internal reliability was observed among each sample. Research using the MRMS-SV can be confident in the scale’s unidimensional validity.

AB - Despite extensive use in research assessing myths around male sexual victimization, the factorial structure of Melanson’s 1999 Male Rape Myth Scale [MRMS] was never psychometrically validated, meaning the relevance of scale items and dimensionality remained untested. Recruiting a nationally representative sample of 4152 UK adults, dimensionality and construct validity of the 22-item MRMS and a modified 19-item shortened version (MRMS-SV) were investigated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Analysis was conducted separately for the complete, male only (n = 2006), and female only (n = 2146) samples. Results indicate scores are best captured by a unidimensional solution across all samples tested, using the modified 19-item MRMS-SV version. Excellent internal reliability was observed among each sample. Research using the MRMS-SV can be confident in the scale’s unidimensional validity.

U2 - 10.1177/10608265251338778

DO - 10.1177/10608265251338778

M3 - Journal article

JO - The Journal of Men’s Studies

JF - The Journal of Men’s Studies

ER -