Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Validity in image-based research

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Validity in image-based research: an elaborated illustration of the issues

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Validity in image-based research: an elaborated illustration of the issues. / Simco, Neil; Warin, Jo.
In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1997, p. 671-673.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Simco, N & Warin, J 1997, 'Validity in image-based research: an elaborated illustration of the issues', British Educational Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 671-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230508

APA

Simco, N., & Warin, J. (1997). Validity in image-based research: an elaborated illustration of the issues. British Educational Research Journal, 23(5), 671-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230508

Vancouver

Simco N, Warin J. Validity in image-based research: an elaborated illustration of the issues. British Educational Research Journal. 1997;23(5):671-673. doi: 10.1080/0141192970230508

Author

Simco, Neil ; Warin, Jo. / Validity in image-based research : an elaborated illustration of the issues. In: British Educational Research Journal. 1997 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 671-673.

Bibtex

@article{4098e79ad0ae4d439a7c44850a27f1eb,
title = "Validity in image-based research: an elaborated illustration of the issues",
abstract = "This article is concerned with the trustworthiness of products of research which are derived from image‐based data. Fundamentally it asks whether validity represents an appropriate measure of the quality of research which uses such data. Two examples of image‐based research are taken from recent work undertaken by the authors. A comparison of these examples provides a well‐grounded illustration of the issues confronted by the researchers in their attempt to consider the validity of their findings. The resulting discussion develops the argument that the concept of validity is particularly problematic in its application to image‐based research. We present a tentative strategy for ensuring trustworthiness that is based on five key criteria: completeness, adequacy of interpretation, transparency, self‐reflection and the aggregation of conflicting interpretations.",
author = "Neil Simco and Jo Warin",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1080/0141192970230508",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "671--673",
journal = "British Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0141-1926",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity in image-based research

T2 - an elaborated illustration of the issues

AU - Simco, Neil

AU - Warin, Jo

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This article is concerned with the trustworthiness of products of research which are derived from image‐based data. Fundamentally it asks whether validity represents an appropriate measure of the quality of research which uses such data. Two examples of image‐based research are taken from recent work undertaken by the authors. A comparison of these examples provides a well‐grounded illustration of the issues confronted by the researchers in their attempt to consider the validity of their findings. The resulting discussion develops the argument that the concept of validity is particularly problematic in its application to image‐based research. We present a tentative strategy for ensuring trustworthiness that is based on five key criteria: completeness, adequacy of interpretation, transparency, self‐reflection and the aggregation of conflicting interpretations.

AB - This article is concerned with the trustworthiness of products of research which are derived from image‐based data. Fundamentally it asks whether validity represents an appropriate measure of the quality of research which uses such data. Two examples of image‐based research are taken from recent work undertaken by the authors. A comparison of these examples provides a well‐grounded illustration of the issues confronted by the researchers in their attempt to consider the validity of their findings. The resulting discussion develops the argument that the concept of validity is particularly problematic in its application to image‐based research. We present a tentative strategy for ensuring trustworthiness that is based on five key criteria: completeness, adequacy of interpretation, transparency, self‐reflection and the aggregation of conflicting interpretations.

U2 - 10.1080/0141192970230508

DO - 10.1080/0141192970230508

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 671

EP - 673

JO - British Educational Research Journal

JF - British Educational Research Journal

SN - 0141-1926

IS - 5

ER -