Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea: Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea: Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”? / Yoon, S.-W.; Jamiyandagva, A.; Vernygora, V. et al.
In: Asian Security, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018, p. 51-65.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Yoon, S-W, Jamiyandagva, A, Vernygora, V, Burton, J, Luguusharav, B & Dorjraa, M 2018, 'Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea: Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”?', Asian Security, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1361733

APA

Yoon, S.-W., Jamiyandagva, A., Vernygora, V., Burton, J., Luguusharav, B., & Dorjraa, M. (2018). Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea: Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”? Asian Security, 14(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1361733

Vancouver

Yoon SW, Jamiyandagva A, Vernygora V, Burton J, Luguusharav B, Dorjraa M. Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea: Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”? Asian Security. 2018;14(1):51-65. doi: 10.1080/14799855.2017.1361733

Author

Yoon, S.-W. ; Jamiyandagva, A. ; Vernygora, V. et al. / Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea : Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”?. In: Asian Security. 2018 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 51-65.

Bibtex

@article{34cf514dc3cf41c280f0f9ba7475296c,
title = "Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea: Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”?",
abstract = "Mongolia and the Republic of Korea are in the same “partnership basket” for NATO in the Asia-Pacific. The two countries have burgeoning relations with NATO, which represent a relatively new dimension of international engagement for the region. Through the lens of Strategic Narrative Theory, we attempt to grasp how the strategic narratives of the two countries resonate with NATO-originated messages sent to partners in the Asia-Pacific. Both countries are attempting to reach a certain level of stability in terms of their respective geo-strategic positions in the Asia-Pacific. In the context of its “Third Neighbor” approach, Mongolia is applying a hedging strategy with regard to NATO and other actors in the region, including China, Japan, Russia, and the US. Korea assigns primary significance to its bilateral relationships with bigger powers, most obviously and predominantly the US, while considering NATO a broadly useful if sometimes perfunctory additional partner on a number of other security issues.",
author = "S.-W. Yoon and A. Jamiyandagva and V. Vernygora and J. Burton and B. Luguusharav and M. Dorjraa",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/14799855.2017.1361733",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "51--65",
journal = "Asian Security",
issn = "1479-9855",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Views on NATO from Mongolia and the Republic of Korea

T2 - Hedging Strategy, and “Perfunctory Partnership”?

AU - Yoon, S.-W.

AU - Jamiyandagva, A.

AU - Vernygora, V.

AU - Burton, J.

AU - Luguusharav, B.

AU - Dorjraa, M.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Mongolia and the Republic of Korea are in the same “partnership basket” for NATO in the Asia-Pacific. The two countries have burgeoning relations with NATO, which represent a relatively new dimension of international engagement for the region. Through the lens of Strategic Narrative Theory, we attempt to grasp how the strategic narratives of the two countries resonate with NATO-originated messages sent to partners in the Asia-Pacific. Both countries are attempting to reach a certain level of stability in terms of their respective geo-strategic positions in the Asia-Pacific. In the context of its “Third Neighbor” approach, Mongolia is applying a hedging strategy with regard to NATO and other actors in the region, including China, Japan, Russia, and the US. Korea assigns primary significance to its bilateral relationships with bigger powers, most obviously and predominantly the US, while considering NATO a broadly useful if sometimes perfunctory additional partner on a number of other security issues.

AB - Mongolia and the Republic of Korea are in the same “partnership basket” for NATO in the Asia-Pacific. The two countries have burgeoning relations with NATO, which represent a relatively new dimension of international engagement for the region. Through the lens of Strategic Narrative Theory, we attempt to grasp how the strategic narratives of the two countries resonate with NATO-originated messages sent to partners in the Asia-Pacific. Both countries are attempting to reach a certain level of stability in terms of their respective geo-strategic positions in the Asia-Pacific. In the context of its “Third Neighbor” approach, Mongolia is applying a hedging strategy with regard to NATO and other actors in the region, including China, Japan, Russia, and the US. Korea assigns primary significance to its bilateral relationships with bigger powers, most obviously and predominantly the US, while considering NATO a broadly useful if sometimes perfunctory additional partner on a number of other security issues.

U2 - 10.1080/14799855.2017.1361733

DO - 10.1080/14799855.2017.1361733

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 51

EP - 65

JO - Asian Security

JF - Asian Security

SN - 1479-9855

IS - 1

ER -