Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Voicing concerns

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • trouble_with_voice_data_draft_v14

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science and Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science and Justice, 61, 4, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006

    Accepted author manuscript, 441 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Voicing concerns: the balance between data protection principles and research developments in forensic speech science

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Voicing concerns : the balance between data protection principles and research developments in forensic speech science. / Brown, Georgina; Ross, Sula; Kirchhuebel, Christin.

In: Science and Justice, Vol. 61, No. 4, 30.07.2021, p. 311-318.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brown G, Ross S, Kirchhuebel C. Voicing concerns: the balance between data protection principles and research developments in forensic speech science. Science and Justice. 2021 Jul 30;61(4):311-318. Epub 2021 Jun 2. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006

Author

Bibtex

@article{39cb2801f22743b4855c299f25a24014,
title = "Voicing concerns: the balance between data protection principles and research developments in forensic speech science",
abstract = "The status of forensic speech recordings among existing data protection guidance is not clear. The inherent nature of voice and the way in which forensic speech casework is currently allocated mean that there are additional barriers to incorporating real casework data into research activities. The key objective of this work is to explore data protection solutions that could enable the forensic speech science community to responsibly use real casework data for research and development purposes. While reviewing relevant guidance and rulings, issues such as proportionality, opportunism and data minimisation are addressed, as well as where voice sits in relation to the definition of “biometric data”. This paper ultimately places forensic speech recordings in the data protection context to illuminate the specific issues that arise for this data type.",
keywords = "Data protection, Forensic speech recordings, Data retention, Proportionality",
author = "Georgina Brown and Sula Ross and Christin Kirchhuebel",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science and Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science and Justice, 61, 4, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "311--318",
journal = "Science and Justice",
issn = "1355-0306",
publisher = "Forensic Science Society",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voicing concerns

T2 - the balance between data protection principles and research developments in forensic speech science

AU - Brown, Georgina

AU - Ross, Sula

AU - Kirchhuebel, Christin

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science and Justice. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science and Justice, 61, 4, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006

PY - 2021/7/30

Y1 - 2021/7/30

N2 - The status of forensic speech recordings among existing data protection guidance is not clear. The inherent nature of voice and the way in which forensic speech casework is currently allocated mean that there are additional barriers to incorporating real casework data into research activities. The key objective of this work is to explore data protection solutions that could enable the forensic speech science community to responsibly use real casework data for research and development purposes. While reviewing relevant guidance and rulings, issues such as proportionality, opportunism and data minimisation are addressed, as well as where voice sits in relation to the definition of “biometric data”. This paper ultimately places forensic speech recordings in the data protection context to illuminate the specific issues that arise for this data type.

AB - The status of forensic speech recordings among existing data protection guidance is not clear. The inherent nature of voice and the way in which forensic speech casework is currently allocated mean that there are additional barriers to incorporating real casework data into research activities. The key objective of this work is to explore data protection solutions that could enable the forensic speech science community to responsibly use real casework data for research and development purposes. While reviewing relevant guidance and rulings, issues such as proportionality, opportunism and data minimisation are addressed, as well as where voice sits in relation to the definition of “biometric data”. This paper ultimately places forensic speech recordings in the data protection context to illuminate the specific issues that arise for this data type.

KW - Data protection

KW - Forensic speech recordings

KW - Data retention

KW - Proportionality

U2 - 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.05.006

M3 - Review article

VL - 61

SP - 311

EP - 318

JO - Science and Justice

JF - Science and Justice

SN - 1355-0306

IS - 4

ER -