Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Wake-Tracking and Turbulence Modelling in Compu...

Associated organisational unit


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Wake-Tracking and Turbulence Modelling in Computational Aerodynamics of Wind Turbine Airfoils

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/2009
<mark>Journal</mark>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy
Issue number8
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)939-951
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This article addresses two modelling aspects of wind turbine aerofoil aerodynamics based on the solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations. One of these is the effect of an a priori method for structured grid adaptation aimed at improving the wake resolution. The presented results emphasize that the proposed adaptation strategy greatly improves the wake resolution in the far field, whereas the wake is completely diffused by the non-adapted grid with the same number and spacing patterns of grid nodes. The proposed adaptation approach can be easily included in the structured generation process of both commercial and in-house-structured mesh generators. The other numerical aspect examined herein is the impact of particular choices for turbulence modelling on the predicted solution. This includes the comparative analysis of numerical solutions obtained by using different turbulence models, and also aims at quantifying the solution inaccuracy arising from not modelling the laminar-to-turbulent transition. It is found that the drag forces obtained by considering the flow as transitional or fully turbulent may differ by 50 per cent.
All these issues are investigated using a special-purpose hyperbolic grid generator and two multi block structured finite volume RANS codes. The numerical experiments consider the flow field past a wind turbine aerofoil for which an exhaustive campaign of steady and unsteady experimental measurements was conducted. The predictive capabilities of the CFD solvers are validated by comparing experimental data and numerical predictions for selected flow regimes. The incompressible analysis and design code XFOIL is also used to support the findings of the comparative analysis of numerical RANS-based results and experimental data.