Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > War making and state-making in Northeast Syria

Electronic data

  • 2025musaakgülphd

    Final published version, 3.24 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

War making and state-making in Northeast Syria: understanding Quasi-State activities of the Democratic Union Party

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

War making and state-making in Northeast Syria: understanding Quasi-State activities of the Democratic Union Party. / Akgul, Musa.
Lancaster University, 2025. 329 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Akgul M. War making and state-making in Northeast Syria: understanding Quasi-State activities of the Democratic Union Party. Lancaster University, 2025. 329 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2788

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{f09d738bea2e46278a8800a5ab519093,
title = "War making and state-making in Northeast Syria: understanding Quasi-State activities of the Democratic Union Party",
abstract = "This study focuses on the quasi-state activities of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) in northeast Syria between 2012 and 2019. The PYD claims to be building a model of „Democratic Autonomy‟ and „Democratic Confederalism‟ based on the teachings of Abdullah {\"O}calan. The literature generally portrays this model as a „stateless‟ form of governance in contrast to the nation-state model. However, building on the bellicist tradition and Charles Tilly's theory of war-making and state-making, I analyze the relationship between the Syrian civil war and the formation of a state-like entity by the PYD. This qualitative case study reveals a significant gap between the PYD‟s discourse and practices, drawing on various primary and secondary sources. The PYD is involved in state-making activities through its war-making capabilities, organizational preparations, ideological power, and alliances with domestic and foreign actors. The PYD‟s state-building mechanisms include administration, territorial control, monopolization of violence, military conscription, protection and security, judicial structure, public services, economic regulation, a taxation system, and diplomatic relations. Moreover, the PYD employs diverse identity-building strategies to legitimize its authority. This empirical study highlights broader implications regarding the rise of violent non-state actors (VNSAs) and the emergence of state-like entities in contemporary Middle Eastern conflicts. It demonstrates how such actors undertake governance activities and replicate modern state-building mechanisms in the context of state failure. This study also presents how an ethno-nationalist VNSA constructs a distinct territorial identity and geopolitical discourse through a territorialization process akin to state sovereignty, enhancing the understanding of how state-seeking nationalism influences governance, identity-building, and legitimization activities of separatist VNSAs.",
author = "Musa Akgul",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2788",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - War making and state-making in Northeast Syria

T2 - understanding Quasi-State activities of the Democratic Union Party

AU - Akgul, Musa

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This study focuses on the quasi-state activities of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) in northeast Syria between 2012 and 2019. The PYD claims to be building a model of „Democratic Autonomy‟ and „Democratic Confederalism‟ based on the teachings of Abdullah Öcalan. The literature generally portrays this model as a „stateless‟ form of governance in contrast to the nation-state model. However, building on the bellicist tradition and Charles Tilly's theory of war-making and state-making, I analyze the relationship between the Syrian civil war and the formation of a state-like entity by the PYD. This qualitative case study reveals a significant gap between the PYD‟s discourse and practices, drawing on various primary and secondary sources. The PYD is involved in state-making activities through its war-making capabilities, organizational preparations, ideological power, and alliances with domestic and foreign actors. The PYD‟s state-building mechanisms include administration, territorial control, monopolization of violence, military conscription, protection and security, judicial structure, public services, economic regulation, a taxation system, and diplomatic relations. Moreover, the PYD employs diverse identity-building strategies to legitimize its authority. This empirical study highlights broader implications regarding the rise of violent non-state actors (VNSAs) and the emergence of state-like entities in contemporary Middle Eastern conflicts. It demonstrates how such actors undertake governance activities and replicate modern state-building mechanisms in the context of state failure. This study also presents how an ethno-nationalist VNSA constructs a distinct territorial identity and geopolitical discourse through a territorialization process akin to state sovereignty, enhancing the understanding of how state-seeking nationalism influences governance, identity-building, and legitimization activities of separatist VNSAs.

AB - This study focuses on the quasi-state activities of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) in northeast Syria between 2012 and 2019. The PYD claims to be building a model of „Democratic Autonomy‟ and „Democratic Confederalism‟ based on the teachings of Abdullah Öcalan. The literature generally portrays this model as a „stateless‟ form of governance in contrast to the nation-state model. However, building on the bellicist tradition and Charles Tilly's theory of war-making and state-making, I analyze the relationship between the Syrian civil war and the formation of a state-like entity by the PYD. This qualitative case study reveals a significant gap between the PYD‟s discourse and practices, drawing on various primary and secondary sources. The PYD is involved in state-making activities through its war-making capabilities, organizational preparations, ideological power, and alliances with domestic and foreign actors. The PYD‟s state-building mechanisms include administration, territorial control, monopolization of violence, military conscription, protection and security, judicial structure, public services, economic regulation, a taxation system, and diplomatic relations. Moreover, the PYD employs diverse identity-building strategies to legitimize its authority. This empirical study highlights broader implications regarding the rise of violent non-state actors (VNSAs) and the emergence of state-like entities in contemporary Middle Eastern conflicts. It demonstrates how such actors undertake governance activities and replicate modern state-building mechanisms in the context of state failure. This study also presents how an ethno-nationalist VNSA constructs a distinct territorial identity and geopolitical discourse through a territorialization process akin to state sovereignty, enhancing the understanding of how state-seeking nationalism influences governance, identity-building, and legitimization activities of separatist VNSAs.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2788

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2788

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -