Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Water governance and livelihoods
View graph of relations

Water governance and livelihoods: Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Water governance and livelihoods: Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania. / Franks, Tom; Cleaver, Frances; Maganga, Faustin et al.
In: Water Resources and Rural Development, Vol. 1-2, 01.11.2013, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Franks, T, Cleaver, F, Maganga, F & Hall, K 2013, 'Water governance and livelihoods: Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania', Water Resources and Rural Development, vol. 1-2, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2013.07.001

APA

Franks, T., Cleaver, F., Maganga, F., & Hall, K. (2013). Water governance and livelihoods: Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania. Water Resources and Rural Development, 1-2, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2013.07.001

Vancouver

Franks T, Cleaver F, Maganga F, Hall K. Water governance and livelihoods: Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania. Water Resources and Rural Development. 2013 Nov 1;1-2:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.wrr.2013.07.001

Author

Franks, Tom ; Cleaver, Frances ; Maganga, Faustin et al. / Water governance and livelihoods : Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania. In: Water Resources and Rural Development. 2013 ; Vol. 1-2. pp. 1-16.

Bibtex

@article{204f6827b0a34511a5db378e409c5bc0,
title = "Water governance and livelihoods: Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania",
abstract = "How does water governance change over time? What are the outcomes for smallholders and the ecosystems that support them? We review the development of water resources management over the past 40 years in the Kimani catchment of the Usangu plains, in southwestern Tanzania. Our analysis is based on a conceptual framework for water governance comprising a system of resources, arrangements for access, and outcomes for people and ecosystems. We discuss how the resources for water governance have changed over time, we consider the changing arrangements for water allocation, particularly relating to water rights, water management organisations and physical infrastructure, and we analyse the outcomes in terms of access to water for people and of maintenance of environmental flows. Development of water resources in Kimani has been successful on many counts, resulting in assured supplies for many users, with consequent improvements in livelihoods, including, in particular, increases in land-holding size. However, these improvements are accompanied by some negative outcomes, as they reduce water access for other users and threaten downstream flows. The experiences from Kimani highlight the need to map the whole institutional landscape and to ensure that physical infrastructure reflects institutional arrangements when designing interventions to enhance water security. Such interventions may well have significant outcomes for equity and power relations amongst water users.",
keywords = "Ecosystems, Institutions, Irrigation, Water management, Water rights, Wetlands",
author = "Tom Franks and Frances Cleaver and Faustin Maganga and Kurt Hall",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wrr.2013.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "1-2",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Water Resources and Rural Development",
issn = "2212-6082",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Water governance and livelihoods

T2 - Outcomes for smallholders on the Usangu plains, Tanzania

AU - Franks, Tom

AU - Cleaver, Frances

AU - Maganga, Faustin

AU - Hall, Kurt

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - How does water governance change over time? What are the outcomes for smallholders and the ecosystems that support them? We review the development of water resources management over the past 40 years in the Kimani catchment of the Usangu plains, in southwestern Tanzania. Our analysis is based on a conceptual framework for water governance comprising a system of resources, arrangements for access, and outcomes for people and ecosystems. We discuss how the resources for water governance have changed over time, we consider the changing arrangements for water allocation, particularly relating to water rights, water management organisations and physical infrastructure, and we analyse the outcomes in terms of access to water for people and of maintenance of environmental flows. Development of water resources in Kimani has been successful on many counts, resulting in assured supplies for many users, with consequent improvements in livelihoods, including, in particular, increases in land-holding size. However, these improvements are accompanied by some negative outcomes, as they reduce water access for other users and threaten downstream flows. The experiences from Kimani highlight the need to map the whole institutional landscape and to ensure that physical infrastructure reflects institutional arrangements when designing interventions to enhance water security. Such interventions may well have significant outcomes for equity and power relations amongst water users.

AB - How does water governance change over time? What are the outcomes for smallholders and the ecosystems that support them? We review the development of water resources management over the past 40 years in the Kimani catchment of the Usangu plains, in southwestern Tanzania. Our analysis is based on a conceptual framework for water governance comprising a system of resources, arrangements for access, and outcomes for people and ecosystems. We discuss how the resources for water governance have changed over time, we consider the changing arrangements for water allocation, particularly relating to water rights, water management organisations and physical infrastructure, and we analyse the outcomes in terms of access to water for people and of maintenance of environmental flows. Development of water resources in Kimani has been successful on many counts, resulting in assured supplies for many users, with consequent improvements in livelihoods, including, in particular, increases in land-holding size. However, these improvements are accompanied by some negative outcomes, as they reduce water access for other users and threaten downstream flows. The experiences from Kimani highlight the need to map the whole institutional landscape and to ensure that physical infrastructure reflects institutional arrangements when designing interventions to enhance water security. Such interventions may well have significant outcomes for equity and power relations amongst water users.

KW - Ecosystems

KW - Institutions

KW - Irrigation

KW - Water management

KW - Water rights

KW - Wetlands

U2 - 10.1016/j.wrr.2013.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.wrr.2013.07.001

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84897128922

VL - 1-2

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Water Resources and Rural Development

JF - Water Resources and Rural Development

SN - 2212-6082

ER -