Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > "We have the character of an island nation"

Electronic data

  • RSCAS 2016-36

    Final published version, 902 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

"We have the character of an island nation": a discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron's "Bloomberg Speech" on the European Union

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

"We have the character of an island nation": a discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron's "Bloomberg Speech" on the European Union. / Wodak, Ruth Emily.
European University Institute, 2016. (EUI Working Paper; Vol. 2016, No. 36).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@techreport{b530cde96eab4f2ea995c009c6a3ddf6,
title = "{"}We have the character of an island nation{"}: a discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron's {"}Bloomberg Speech{"} on the European Union",
abstract = "More than three years have passed since former British Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a much acknowledged and controversial speech on 23rd January 2013, in respect to the British relationship with the European Union. Europe and the European Union (EU) are now, of course, facing different challenges than three years ago. The contrasting national and transnational identities which emerge in the so-called Bloomberg Speech (BS) imply a nationalistic body politics which constructs the United Kingdom and England as separate entities contrasted to {"}the continent{"}, i.e. Europe. Hence, BS oscillates between two extremes, in its attempt to alternatively observe maximum distance to the EU and some proximity to its economic policies. Moreover, both the topoi of urgency and threat/danger are appealed to – warning the EU that it would suffer under the loss of the United Kingdom; but also warning British voters that Brexit would damage their future and prosperity. This speech can be perceived as the starting point for the referendum on June 23rd, 2016 – which resulted in a tiny majority wanting to leave the EU ('Brexit'). Of course, there is no clear causal connection between BS and Brexit; but many arguments of the {"}remain and leave campaigns{"} can be traced to the BS; as well as the huge ambivalence framing Cameron's position towards the EU.",
author = "Wodak, {Ruth Emily}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
series = "EUI Working Paper",
publisher = "European University Institute",
number = "36",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "European University Institute",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - "We have the character of an island nation"

T2 - a discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron's "Bloomberg Speech" on the European Union

AU - Wodak, Ruth Emily

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - More than three years have passed since former British Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a much acknowledged and controversial speech on 23rd January 2013, in respect to the British relationship with the European Union. Europe and the European Union (EU) are now, of course, facing different challenges than three years ago. The contrasting national and transnational identities which emerge in the so-called Bloomberg Speech (BS) imply a nationalistic body politics which constructs the United Kingdom and England as separate entities contrasted to "the continent", i.e. Europe. Hence, BS oscillates between two extremes, in its attempt to alternatively observe maximum distance to the EU and some proximity to its economic policies. Moreover, both the topoi of urgency and threat/danger are appealed to – warning the EU that it would suffer under the loss of the United Kingdom; but also warning British voters that Brexit would damage their future and prosperity. This speech can be perceived as the starting point for the referendum on June 23rd, 2016 – which resulted in a tiny majority wanting to leave the EU ('Brexit'). Of course, there is no clear causal connection between BS and Brexit; but many arguments of the "remain and leave campaigns" can be traced to the BS; as well as the huge ambivalence framing Cameron's position towards the EU.

AB - More than three years have passed since former British Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a much acknowledged and controversial speech on 23rd January 2013, in respect to the British relationship with the European Union. Europe and the European Union (EU) are now, of course, facing different challenges than three years ago. The contrasting national and transnational identities which emerge in the so-called Bloomberg Speech (BS) imply a nationalistic body politics which constructs the United Kingdom and England as separate entities contrasted to "the continent", i.e. Europe. Hence, BS oscillates between two extremes, in its attempt to alternatively observe maximum distance to the EU and some proximity to its economic policies. Moreover, both the topoi of urgency and threat/danger are appealed to – warning the EU that it would suffer under the loss of the United Kingdom; but also warning British voters that Brexit would damage their future and prosperity. This speech can be perceived as the starting point for the referendum on June 23rd, 2016 – which resulted in a tiny majority wanting to leave the EU ('Brexit'). Of course, there is no clear causal connection between BS and Brexit; but many arguments of the "remain and leave campaigns" can be traced to the BS; as well as the huge ambivalence framing Cameron's position towards the EU.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - EUI Working Paper

BT - "We have the character of an island nation"

PB - European University Institute

ER -